User talk:Slr722x

My Talk page; chat to me.

May 2012
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on User talk: Fat&Happy were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved by another user. In the future you can use the "New section" link in top right. For more details see talk page guidelines. Thank you. ''Just to inform you. '' Chip123456 (talk) 16:22, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:The entrance of Darul Uloom Zakariyya.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The entrance of Darul Uloom Zakariyya.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Darul Uloom Zakariyya
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Darul Uloom Zakariyya, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://duzak.org/index.php/history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 01:30, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Darul Uloom Zakariyya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Indian, Rugby, Black belt and Doctor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Darul Uloom Zakariyya
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Darul Uloom Zakariyya, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://duzak.org/index.php/history, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Darul Uloom Zakariyya and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Darul Uloom Zakariyya, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Darul Uloom Zakariyya with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Darul Uloom Zakariyya. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Darul Uloom Zakariyya saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! &mdash; madman 02:18, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm CambridgeBayWeather. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jannah without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Please read What Wikipedia is not CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 11:50, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ''I know exactly how some sects of Islam feel about images. However, as the link I provided you before states; "Any rules that forbid members of a given organization, fraternity, or religion to show a name or image do not apply to Wikipedia because Wikipedia is not a member of those organizations." '' CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 13:02, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Islam and images
There is nothing wrong with the word sect but we can use religious denomination if you prefer. A look at Islamic schools and branches it is quite obvious that there are several divisions within Islam. Now not all those divisions have a prohibition against images, but you as a Muslim must already know that. I suggest you read aniconism in Islam and depictions of Muhammad where it is quite clear that within some denominations, such as Shia Islam, images are permitted. However, other denominations, such as Sunni Islam, forbid all images. Suggesting that you will continue to try and attempt to censor Wikipedia to you particular beliefs will likely end up with you being blocked. Some other things that may help you understand this are Offensive material, Content disclaimer, Help:Options to hide an image and Manual of Style/Islam-related articles. If you feel that it is necessary to remove all images from Islamic then you should go on to read Talk:Muhammad/FAQ, Talk:Muhammad/images, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images and Requests for comment/Muhammad images. Following that you need to start a request for comment at Requests for comment but do not just continue on removing images when consensus is against you. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 19:12, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Jannah. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 18:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of DaraloomZakariyyaLogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of DaraloomZakariyyaLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 16 May 2019 (UTC)