User talk:Slsnw12/sandbox

Excellent work! I agree that this case has large implications in the field. You may already know this, information available at the SCOTUSBlog (http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/tyson-foods-inc-v-bouaphakeo/)may also be very helpful to understand the case and its implications.

Alex2018ALR (talk) 17:24, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Alex Thanks, Alex! Slsnw12 (talk) 17:30, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Ale's Peer Review
I thought your article was very well done (it also brought back memories from FedLit)! You did a great job of balancing the detail necessary to explain this case with its bigger picture significance. I was also very impressed by the comprehensiveness of the list of cases and secondary resources that you compiled for further research!

My only suggested modification would be an elaboration of what exactly the predominance inquiry is. I know you include the legal question to be answered: "whether common questions predominate over individual ones," but for readers that aren't as familiar with the inquiry it might help to distill this in lay person's terms a bit more (for example, why the requirement exists and what its purpose is in the class action context).

Great work - I know that lots of people will benefit from your work :) Alel19 (talk) 06:05, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Nicole's Response
Thanks, Ale! I will try to expand and clarify the question of predominance. Slsnw12 (talk) 16:25, 30 May 2018 (UTC)