User talk:Slulek

Eliphas Dow
Here is the deleted page you requested. Please make sure you take care of any copyright issues before you repost it. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 22:45, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Eliphas Dow (b.1705 - d. May 8, 1755)

Eliphas Dow of Hampton Falls, New Hampshire was executed for the murder of Peter Clough also from Hampton Falls. It appeared upon evidence, that a feud had subsisted between them for quite some time. On December,12 1754, they accidentally met at the house of Eliphas' brother Noah Dow. They began to threaten each other, then Clough challenged Dow to go out of the house to fight. Eliphas went out himself. Dow followed & as he went out, took up his brothers hoe and struck Clough with a massive blow on the side of the head which instantly killed him.

Trial and Execution

Dow was arrested and went before the honorable judge Meshech Weare. He was committed to prison in Portsmouth. " At the February term of Superior Court, he was indicted, tried & convicted: and sentence was pronounced upon him that he should be hanged by the neck until he should be dead." Sentence ordered to be executed on March 20, but two reprieves were allowed until May 8, 1755. Eliphas pleaded "strictly self defense" at his trial. He was the first male to be executed in New Hampshire. Many people came out to see the public execution.

The exact location of the gallows had been debated for sometime. Some accounts have descriptions of the corner South and Sagamore Streets. Some historic accounts have the location of Ward's Corner. He was hung for about three hours between the time of twelve noon until three in the afternoon. His body was buried in the road a few rods from the gallows, just at the declivity of the hill.

Some written accounts has his name as Eliphaz Dow.

July 2008
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 18:40, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

There are no comments from anyone in the discussion pages at allSlulek (talk) 03:09, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * That does not excuse removing the AfD notice. Discussion is sometimes slow to start. Until the AfD is completed, the tag must remain on the article. The closing administrator will remove the tag from the article if it is kept. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:11, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

I see... I just seems a bit personal for one person to nominate an article that interests someone. I happen to like New hampshire history and when I saw the list of 24 people that NH executed. It got me thinking and I wanted to know the backstory on all of them. I spend 4 or 5 hours a weekSlulek (talk) 03:17, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

also.. how long do those tags stay on? and if not one ever comments in them, they get deleted?. Slulek (talk) 03:24, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The tags stay on until the AfD is completed, usually 5 days. If no one comments at all, it will be relisted. If there is no consensus for deletion, it will be kept. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the Information. I love Wikipedia. I catch myself hitting random article for a hour or so. Just learning the strangest things... Ha-ha. I once looked up an article about honey bee's and about a week later i had a hive of 800,000 growing in a wall. Murphy's law? have a good night Slulek (talk) 03:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * LOL, be glad you didn't read about earthquakes or something ;-) And just to respond to an earlier note, there isn't generally anything personal meant when someone nominates an article for deletion. Not all topics that interest us may meet Wikipedia's guidelines for existance. I'm interesting in the history of Bryan-College Station (as well as US history in general), but many places here that are historical in a local sense are not historical enough to have Wikipedia articles. Night night. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! DougsTech (talk) 08:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion of Eliphas Dow
A tag has been placed on Eliphas Dow, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 13:23, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

There was quite a bit of this article that was rewritten. I am still doing research about this case. last time a "bot" found a someones web page that used the the same source I did. Slulek (talk) 13:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Cheswell.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Cheswell.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:01, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
Message delivered by Dominic at 08:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 10:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

You're invited!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Brooks Dodge
Hi. Please stop adding unsourced information to this article. Everything you add MUST be sourced. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 18:40, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Stoke
Apologies if I jumped in there too quickly on that article; I did not realize it was so fresh!--- Possibly (talk) 19:26, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

No worries... i am just trying to link all the UNH Presidents.. slulek (talk) 19:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Thomas N. Bonner moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Thomas N. Bonner, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 03:21, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Remove border on Seabrook occupation poster
Hi there, thanks for uploading https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Clamshell_oct77.png ! Would you be willing and able to remove the borders to the right and the left? I find these empty borders eat up a lot of precious horizontal space: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Douginamug/Notes:Consensus_decision-making#History I would be willing to do the editing and send you the finished file, if you'd like. DougInAMug talk 21:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I just realized I could do it myself, and did so! Hope OK DougInAMug talk 21:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * it is totally fine... looks great slulek (talk) 22:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)