User talk:Slyemm

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  01:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not finding where you are blocked. Would you please post the blocking message with the reason and admin. That should help.

Oh - well I was blocked. But now I'm not… So that's mysterious?! But thank you for responding so quickly!!Slyemm (talk) 01:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Simone Yemm

Speedy deletion nomination of ExitLeft


A tag has been placed on ExitLeft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 02:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi. Thanks for your message on the ExitLeft talkpage. It sounds like a great theatre! The problem with the article is that while all the points were appropriately referenced, they were essentially confirming the theatre's existence and performances and not indicating why the theatre itself was notable enough for an encyclopedia entry. What we'd need is some indication that the theatre itself had been the subject of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. That would be something like mainstream newspaper articles on the theatre itself (ie. not reviews of individual performances), or coverage of interesting historical elements or architectural features.


 * I know how unwelcome it is for an article you've created to be deleted. Please be assured that it is in no way a reflection onthe quality of your referencing or the value of the theatre itself - it's entirely to do with the need for all articles to meet the requirements for general notability. If you think there is the kind of notable coverage I've mentioned above, please let me know and I'll send you a copy of the article in your userspace. That way you can go on working on it, add in the additional references to support notability, and repost the article to Wikipedia.


 * Also happy to discuss if I haven't adequately explained why the article in its current form was removed. All the best with continued editing, -- Euryalus (talk) 05:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)