User talk:Slyfoxninja

August 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rush Limbaugh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm BilCat. Your recent edit to the page Continent appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - BilCat (talk) 16:14, 28 December 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 07:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

It would be useful information to the reviewing admin to know whether or not you have removed this browser extension to prevent further vandalism. --Yamla (talk) 10:36, 5 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Materialscientist, I have confirmed that there is indeed a Chrome extension which replaces every occurrence of "Trump" with "Drumpf", so the explanation given above is plausible. Also, the amount of disruptive editing is very small for an indefinite block, particularly in view of the fact that there has been only one attempted edit (apart from the unblock request) since 2015. Would you agree to unblocking? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth I would endorse this unblock request, pending the blocking admin's input. I can see why the user would be confused about the block: the notice is placed below a "December 2015" header and apparently other than tripping the edit filter log that one time they haven't edited in over a year. There was a wave of intentional Drumpf vandalism last year followed by a wave of inadvertent vandalism from folks who installed the extension and weren't aware that it was also changing their Wikipedia edits (see ), resulting in the filter, so indef was not an overreaction here at all. But assuming good faith that Slyfoxninja has disabled the extension now, it seems the problem is resolved. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:47, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * They haven't disabled it - see my unblock decline. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Heh, I didn't think Vanjagenije would have made that mistake. I should've checked. Yeah I totally agree, turn off the extension before you try to edit again. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I have disabled and removed it from my extensions. If I knew this extension was going to cause issues with Wikipedia I wouldn't have bothered with it. What's funny is that all this started with me looking up the one dollar men for my college history class. Slyfoxninja (talk) 21:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)