User talk:Slynnharp

November 2014
Hello, I'm Muboshgu. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Gordon Klingenschmitt seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Gordon Klingenschmitt shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:44, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Gordon Klingenschmitt
Hi there. In your edits to remove content you find objectionable, you are removing a lot of other content and reverting changes that Muboshgu has made which improve the article. Could you explain why you don't think the content should be included on the article's talk page instead? I see that you've cited "extreme leftist bias" a lack of "balanced facts or sources" and the subtitle of his website as reasons for removing the content. It is however clearly referenced to reliable sources and is presented in a neutral way. Thanks, Tiller54 (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2014 (UTC)