User talk:Slytherin House

Questionable edits / August 2007

 * Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please always observe our core policies. (Refers to the though sometimes members of the house can come off as "sissies" //bias//. addition, complete with template to note the add itself was bias.)


 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. (Referring to the unsourced addition Perhaps, it has been suggested, Malfoy is one of the most misunderstood and complicated characters in the series complete. Alternatively, this could fall under the heading of Original Research - something that I struggled with when I first started on Wiki also... it's understandable.)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  (Refers to the insertion of another "roider" in text.)


 * Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. (This one refers to the comment you added stating known for its plethora of computer gaming intelligentsia around the globe throughout, which is at best a Point-of-view comment, but also is difficult phraseologically to understand.)


 * And finally... Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia.  Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed.  All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source.  If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them.  Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do.  Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.  (for the inappropriate template-comment to my userpage. I explained each reversion sufficiently and with proper justification.


 * I'm not trying to be meanspirited here (though your template comment to my userpage gives me less reason to not be so), but it seems that you have contributed in ways that are not quite in the Wikipedia way. That's fine, we all have! Go ahead and read through some of the WikiPolicies; look at the edits of others! You'll see soon some other ways to add, and in many cases, add the same information in a less-POV fashion! Welcome to Wikipedia and best of luck editing through the future!!! VigilancePrime 20:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)