User talk:Slytime

Hello, Slytime,

I noticed your contributions to Salman Khan's article. While new editors are always welcome to contribute, it's important to realize that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and not a film magazine article compendium.

Expressions like "Bollywood's Most Breathtakingly Beautiful Women", "One thought, and with reason enough, that Salman Khan had only biceps and some stylish hops to offer to Bollywood", "sensuous epitome of a cinematic diva" and "chocolate boy looks" don't belong there. Also, parts of the article were copied from other websites, e.g.. That's considered copyright violation and we take that very seriously here.

As for Katrina Kaif's supermodel-status: she isn't a supermodel. There is a very precise definition of the term supermodel and she definetely doesn't fit into the category.

You're most welcome to help and improve the article, but please, try to keep it as neutral as possible. If you put in parts from other websites, this will be considered as vandalism and copyright violation and could result in banning.

Best regards, --Plumcouch 16:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:SalmanKhan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SalmanKhan.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 10:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Salman Khan picture
Hi, Slytime,

about that Salman Khan pic: I think it`s acceptable to add it to his profile, because: a) The actor's box (which apparently has been officially approved by WP) has a field where you can add the official homepage of an actor. b) If the URL of an official Homepage is mentioned on the article in letters or simply printed on a picture, I think there's no difference. c) There are good chances to make that picture PD by using the Creative Common license 2.0: See here I'm going to ask the webmaster of Salman Khan`s homepage if that is possible.

Best regards, -- Plum couch Talk2Me 16:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

PS. Some User has vandalised the picture again - the guy seems to be pretty active these days, so watch out.