User talk:Sm8900/Archive 16

Help me!
Please help me with... how do we enable the parameter for "state", i.e. state="extended", to be used with this template, template:Franklin D. Roosevelt? trying to do so. appreciate any help. thanks.

Sm8900 (talk) 14:41, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * First question, did you try spelling the name of the state as "expanded"?  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 15:14, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * no, didn't try that. do you recommend trying that step? Sm8900 (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, it is how it's documented to work. But I'm trying to figure out if this is a simple question of misspelling or if you have a harder question buried in there.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 15:28, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * hi, actually, I just edited the template parameter at the following edit, and now it seems to be working fine. so perhaps my question was a bit premature. anyway, I welcome any input on this. thanks for your reply!!


 * Link to edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_federal_judges_appointed_by_Franklin_D._Roosevelt&oldid=920083167


 * thanks. Sm8900 (talk) 15:48, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , looks like it has been solved now; an editor modified the template to assist with this. thanks! Sm8900 (talk) 15:59, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll mark this as resolved, but I'll note that your templatedata addition seems incomplete.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 16:09, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I looked at the source for the Navbox module and it appears that only the values collapsed and autocollapsed are recognized and acted upon. It seems that anything else is just treated as if it were expanded, a word that is not explicitly checked for as a value.
 * All that aside, I recommend that you leave the state as autocollapsed on the federal judges article.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 16:25, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * hm, ok, if that's your preference, I'm glad to accommodate you. thanks! Sm8900 (talk) 16:26, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

A barnstar for you!

 * thanks so much!!! I truly appreciate your gesture and your sentiments above. thanks!!! --Sm8900 (talk) 04:08, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

question re barnstar template
I found this template at another user's page. User:Derek.cashman/Barnstar box. it seems to be a useful way to compile all of the barnstars for one user. however, I have no idea how to add it to my own page for my own use. when I try to find the page for this template, I don't seem able to do so. can you please assist? thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 15:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)


 * never mind the above; I clicked on that page, and realized it is not a template, but rather a formatted box.


 * however, now I have another question. can you please tell me which templates allow a user to compile their barnstars together? I recall seeing one or more templates like that, but now I can't find them. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 15:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, feel free to copy the code I use on my user page: Include User:Sm8900/topicons anywhere on the page, then copy User:ToBeFree/topicons to User:Sm8900/topicons and modify as you like. Take care to only use "public domain" images. Most icons can not be used in this way, as a link to the image description page is normally required for copyright attribution. Only "public domain" (or Creative Commons Zero) icons can be used in this way.
 * As this does not directly answer your question, I am not closing this help request. Please replace helpme by help me-helped if this is already sufficient. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:23, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , that sounds good. thanks! I will give that a try. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 16:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Face-smile.svg You're welcome, feel free to ask for help if that doesn't work. Should we close the help request for now? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , well, we should leave it open, but I'm only doing so due to your own suggestion above. since this is a general request for any options for templates for barnstars, if you think someone else out there has more any other info, items, or options on this, then by all means, let's hear from them as well. thanks!!! --Sm8900 (talk) 16:34, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah okay; if it's just because of my suggestion, then I'm closing it for now. I think the help me template should mainly be used to ask questions about editing Wikipedia; as there is no issue left and this is relatively off-topic, I think this can be removed from the queue. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * ok, sounds fine. ok, but now I have another question, ; where would be the proper place to ask this question, based on your comment above? Thanks! --Sm8900 (talk) 16:59, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , perhaps an off-Wikipedia discussion medium like IRC: See IRC_help_disclaimer, but after clicking the blue button, remove "-help" from the channel form.
 * I'm saying this only because the issue is already solved and this seems to be purely about cosmetical syntax changes to your user page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:07, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , that sounds fine. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 17:37, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...

hi. why can't I edit by section on the archive pages for this talk page? the edit links for each section do not appear on those pages. I have not encountered this problem on any other page. thanks.

Sm8900 (talk) 18:42, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , this is done by Template:Talk archive navigation, see Template talk:Talk archive navigation. Not sure how you'd turn it off though.  Oxon Alex    - talk  18:59, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The magic word is applied by the talk archive template to discourage editing, as discussed at Template talk:Talk archive. While there are certain circumstances where editing a talk archive is the correct thing to do, they are pretty rare, so a general discouragement of editing talk archives is applied.  — jmcgnh (talk)  (contribs) 19:58, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

favorites

 * Village pump

category:mmorpgs /notespage
 * Goings-on

pers pages
User:sm8900/links User:sm8900/Archive User:sm8900/Archive2 User:sm8900/Archive3 User:sm8900/Flashtrek user:sm8900/play by mail list /mmorpg list

//In the Footsteps of Marco Polo User:Sm8900/watchlist

/Flash games User:sm8900/sonofilter user:sm8900/Abul Hussam

/categ contents

/workpage1

DarkSpace /SQO page

game pages
[[/Summer

Your contributed article, History of the world (2008-present)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, History of the world (2008-present). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 21st century. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 21st century. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 17:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

questions on arbitration process
Regarding your questions on the arbitration process, as they are not specific to the case request in question, typically they would be raised at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests. (The talk pages for Arbitration/Requests/Case and Arbitration redirect to it.) isaacl (talk) 22:25, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Allotropes has been nominated for discussion
Category:Allotropes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 15:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Video game review websites has been nominated for discussion
Category:Video game review websites, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Arbitration Case Opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 20, 2019, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, SQL Query me!  20:38, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

New Article: 2010s political history
You asked for my opinion on this new article. The article mentions major events in ten or so countries, but there is no mention at all of most of the other 190 or so countries in the world. Specifically, major actors such as China, India, Russia, and the European Union are not included (except in relation to Hong Kong and Brexit), and major events such as the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, & the Syrian Civil War are not included. Equally serious, almost all the articles seem to begin in 2019. Since you link to more complete articles related to the different issues, you could easily shorten the information in each section and include a wider range of topics. For instance, in the U.S. you mention impeachment of Trump, but you start in 2019 when it has roots that go back to the election in 2016. Plus you say nothing about the Obama Administration, nor about other issues (health care, gun control, trade, the Great Recession--which started in 2007 but dominated from 2010-2011). I didn't read the entire article, but you also have to be careful about citations: I noticed you write about Yemen, "...some have labeled it as a genocide" but neither define "some" nor include a citation.

I can imagine contributing to this article, and I think it is useful to have world political history for the entire decade at a glance. With events happening all over the world at a fast pace, it is easy to overlook or forget events that took place even a few years ago. Best wishes--I think you should go for it.Michael E Nolan (talk) 06:19, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * thanks!! I will do so. I have big plans for this. your efforts have been vital to this.n ow we can move ahead with the kind of ongoing historical record and overview that Wikipedia truly needs and deserves!!! you're right, I didn't cover the whole decade; this was just an initial attempt to get this kind of article up and running. the 2020s are only a fgew weeks away. we should be in great shape for them!! and again, your help and input is really great. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 14:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 5G into 2010s in United States political history. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:26, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Sm8900, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to 2010s in science and technology have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 14:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Categories by country administrative level


A tag has been placed on Category:Categories by country administrative level requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:04, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution (3rd request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2019 in science into 2010s in science and technology. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

See also section on Intentional communities
Hi, I reverted your edit on Intentional community as it is inconsistent with the singular list that I have seen for just about any other See also section. Please see MOS:SEEALSO. Also, it is unclear why the on particular community or region was singled out when there are so many communities. It seems like this particular edit would be better suited to a list article. Peaceray (talk) 05:56, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * hi. thanks for your note. ok, let's discuss. the reason I singled out Jinwar is because it is actually a rare and possibly unique example; an intentional community, set up in a zone of conflict, during an active war, in the Third World. so perhaps it is an exemplary example of this concept in action. could we perhaps consider allowing it to remain there? or else, if not, add a paragraph or two to the entry itself, to describe it? --Sm8900 (talk) 14:45, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Further discussion at Talk:Intentional community Peaceray (talk) 19:42, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2010s in United Kingdom political history, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2010s_in_United_Kingdom_political_history check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2010s_in_United_Kingdom_political_history?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

change of name for article
To me, a "list" chronicles specific events without providing context or follow-up. While I think lists of events in a given time period and/or place are useful, I also like broader, narrative articles that help the reader understand what is going on. I don't like the idea of changing 2010s political history to a list, even though it goes without saying that it cannot be totally comprehensive.
 * thanks for your comments. by the way, could you please add your signature? thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 01:45, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...is there a template which simply allows me to leave a simple text note in italics in an article, i.e. a note that would be visible within the article itself to any editors or readers? you can view this article section for an example of what I mean: 2019_in_United_States_politics_and_government.

I realize I could simply type the text in italics, but I wanted to see if there were any other options. thanks. Sm8900 (talk) 15:20, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll comment but leave the help request open.
 * While the 2019 in United States politics and government page may be a special case, a note like the one you mention is not something that should generally appear in an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia offers a blanket invitation to edit, so there is no need to call out for editing in any one place to the general readership.
 * As to how best to do it, the normal italicization method of doubled single-quotes is going to be shorter and clearer than any template invocation.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 17:42, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * that sounds fine to me. I appreciate your reply. thanks!! Sm8900 (talk) 18:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Dec 18: WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)