User talk:Smallness88

Smallness88, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Rere

July 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Margaret Murray— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been or will be reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Margaret Murray, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 17:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Margaret Murray. DVdm (talk) 17:13, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. North America1000 17:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet Investigation
Sum mer PhD v2.0 01:05, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification

 * Also, there are discretionary sanctions relating to fringe science and pseudoscience. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:30, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * After reviewing your edits, I see that you pushed for autoconfirmed status, immediately engaged in vandalism, and then went off trolling at the refdesks. Also, even if you weren't obviously a sock, the rest of your behavior would leave no one objecting to labeling you as a sock.  Ian.thomson (talk) 02:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Whå? Sockpuppet? Whoa! That's a big word!!

Indef block??

Why?