User talk:Smart.flash26

I love to make and read Articles that's why I choose one of the effective Encyclopedia "Wikipedia".

Welcome!

 * }

Speedy deletion nomination of Okhai Memon


A tag has been placed on Okhai Memon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shirt58 (talk) 12:48, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Muhammad Ilyas Attar Qadiri Razavi
Just wanted to let you know that I saw that you created the new article Muhammad Ilyas Attar Qadiri Razavi--The headings and sections seem appropriate.Amy Z (talk) 03:20, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Okhai Memon Youth Services


A tag has been placed on Okhai Memon Youth Services requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DGaw (talk) 06:19, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Sources on Muhammad Ilyas Qadri
Hi Smart.flash26,

I notice that you've recently added a number of inline citations to Muhammad Ilyas Qadri. However, one of the problems with this article, as flagged by the cleanup tag on the page, is its excessive reliance on www.dawateislami.net. Swapping references to this website for other references to the same website doesn't really solve the problem. It's a primary source, heavily affiliated with the subject of the article, and whilst usable, should really be supplemented by third party sources.

Now I'm going out on a limb here, but I'm assuming from your edit history that you're somehow affiliated with, or at least interested in, the Dawat-e-Islami movement. If that's so, you're in a good position to improve this and a number of other related articles by tracking down appropriate sources. The Dawat-e-Islami movement's own website is not particularly good because it doesn't meet the requirements for reliable sources, but you may well be aware of some other sources (newspaper articles, scholarly publications, independently-published books etc.) that do. If so, please stick them into the article!

Cheers, Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 21:34, 21 November 2011 (UTC)