User talk:Smartie2thaMaxXx/Archive 1

WP:Canada Welcome!

Hello, Smartie2thaMaxXx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Moxy (talk) 03:50, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

"Tokusou"
"Tokusou" appears on CD and DVD boxes for Dekaranger. Do not move pages, again, unless you have a source that uses the other spelling.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 19:36, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * But Jetman and Zyuranger (among other Sentai) have spelling with macrons on the vowels.Smartie2thaMaxXx (talk) 22:03, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, they have macrons in their English text on Japanese material. Dekaranger doesn't.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 00:16, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 01:39, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:HumongousLogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HumongousLogo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 22:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Inuko Inuyama
Please do not recreate this article until significant coverage in independent reliable sources can be found as the current link isn't to a reliable source - it says "This encyclopedia is collaboratively edited by the users of this site". The-Pope (talk) 14:58, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Allan Palmer


A tag has been placed on Allan Palmer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Unionhawk Talk E-mail 16:38, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Mystery of Mamo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Grimes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Back to the Future trilogy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Michael Taylor and Arthur Schmidt


 * Dragon Ball: Curse of the Blood Rubies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Masato Hirano

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ellen Meister


A tag has been placed on Ellen Meister requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:07, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Chuck E. Cheese in the Galaxy 5000, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dave Butler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Cartoon All-Stars to the Rescue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antena 3 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Alvin and the Chipmunks, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. WikiLubber (talk) 19:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Tara Strong. Thank you. Cutecutecuteface2000 (Questions, comments, complaints?) 05:54, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Tara Strong. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cutecutecuteface2000 (Questions, comments, complaints?) 16:02, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for the continued addition of unsourced info despite multiple warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:47, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at The Proclaimers, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Assumed Good Faith at first, later discovered user has only just been unbanned for unconstructive editing after many warnings. An Illusive Man (talk) 03:00, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Daisuke Jigen.png
Thank you for uploading File:Daisuke Jigen.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. When you recently edited List of video games notable for negative reception, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battlefield Earth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. When you recently edited Dragon Ball: Curse of the Blood Rubies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Brooks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited The Golden Turkey Awards, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Conqueror and Mike Henry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:18, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Absurd edits on Lady Godiva Twice over
You do realise that you have killed links from various other articles, I was the one who separated the pages out and now you're re-merging them without having the curiosity of even mentioning once your edit int he talk page. Page merging is a very serious matter that shouldn't be done on whims. If you insist I shall be taking this to a higher authority. Please read WP:LoG and note that covers and originals are not identified as one and the same. Sakimonk (talk) 00:57, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Smartie, just for the record several other editors actually agree with your edit. It's been merged a couple of times since. Any idea what WP:LoG is? --Richhoncho (talk) 13:06, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Only warning
Despite previous warnings and a block you are still adding unsourced personal info to biography articles. If it continues, you will be blocked again. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 01:02, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. When you recently edited The Truth About De-Evolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Island of Lost Souls (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Sesame Street, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 23:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Winnie the Pooh, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DawgDeputy (talk) 00:14, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Blanking of content on Sesame Street
Hi Smartie. It's difficult to understand your intent when you make edits that remove content but provide no explanation for the removal. You can avoid this by leaving edit summaries when you make edits. I was drawn here by your revisions to Sesame Street, and have reverted those edits. If you remove content like this, with no explanation, it just looks like vandalism, which it may not be. You may have a good faith reason for thinking the article would be better with certain content removed, but we can't read your mind. Content blanking is something that will almost always be reverted if it's not obvious why the removal was done, and usually needs to be discussed even if you do have a reason.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:24, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Sesame Street. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MikeWazowski (talk) 03:48, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Sesame Street, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MikeWazowski (talk) 13:21, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

The Jim Henson Company is merely one of many contracted companies, used for the production of Sesame Street. They are not a producer. -- Zanimum (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 19:54, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25
Hi. When you recently edited Tabitha St. Germain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventures (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Disruptive editing and 3RR warning
Your recent editing history at Timon and Pumbaa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --  Krystaleen  12:55, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Sesame Street does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! '' This is especially important when removing content or undoing other's contributions (which you seem to do frequently). '' Senator2029&#8239;•&#8239;talk 20:53, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Vandal
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Zarbonholio (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:48, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Amp71 (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2012 (UTC) You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amp71 (talk) 20:38, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

October 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Monsters University appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. CURTAINTOAD! 06:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Brave (2012 film) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. CURTAINTOAD! 00:41, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brave (2012 film), you may be blocked from editing. CURTAINTOAD! 02:06, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Hey are you delateding the stuff I am putting on Wikipedia when I am almost right about it? If so you are no good for nothing smart ass. --DragonKing22 (talk) 22:59, 16 October 2012 (UTC)DragonKing22

Okay I am sorry, but someone is deleating some of the stuff I put on wikipedia like the Studio Ghibli pages when I add the The Castle of Calistro and GeGeGe no Kitaro in the catagorey: Studio Ghibli when those are some of the things that started Studio Ghibli. Also, the same was in the Toyoo Ashida page that I made with my first user name. If you are wondering why I wanted to put that stuff in GKIDS' category. Here are some links. http://www.gkids.tv/intheaterarchives.cfm http://gkids.com/pdfs/2008program.pdf http://gkids.com/pdfs/NYICFF2009Program.pdf http://gkids.com/pdfs/NYICFF2010program.pdf http://gkids.com/pdfs/2011program.pdf http://www.gkids.tv/dvd.cfm I am sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DragonKing22 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amp71 (talk • contribs)

Haitch
The pronunciation "haitch" is controversial, though common in some dialects. Most dictionaries do not consider it to be "correct", but to be a hypercorrection, though the history is complex. If you use Hiberno-English, then you would be justified in considering it to be standard.  D b f i r s   21:03, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

List of films in the public domain in the United States
"Not reworded properly" - Hi you keep reverting this and I don't understand why and don't want to get into an edit war. Can you explain in more detail why? Thanks. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 05:10, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Charles Martinet
I'm telling you it's true! He did voice donkey kong and I'm going to prove it! 75.147.56.74 (talk) 14:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

I did meet him
I did meet Charles and he did tell me he voiced donkey kong. 75.147.56.74 (talk) 15:22, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

No, I'm telling you I'm not crazy. I've actually met him 75.147.56.74 (talk) 15:29, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

I have proof right here. 75.147.56.74 (talk) 15:49, 16 November 2012 (UTC) http://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/Charles-Martinet/ http://www.charlesmartinet.com/voiceover.html

Disambiguation link notification for November 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Thief and the Cobbler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frederick Shaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Okay I Get You
Sorry, but I need to emphasize the fact that it's true people keep deleting what I put up. Also if you were the one moving a couple of things around, thank you. Mickey798 (talk) 00:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Thomas & Friends. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. S M S  Talk 21:29, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. - Beeblebrox (talk) 00:42, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * This is not the first time you have edit warred. Please make sure it is the last. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:43, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Rugrats-Seinfeld ratings comparison
Please see this discussion. The information preceding the citation is not found in the citation. IsaacAA (talk) 16:11, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * You are not blocked for vandalism, you are blocked for edit warring. You violated WP:3RR at List of programs broadcast by Toon Disney but what concerned me more as that it seems you have no comprehension of what edit warring is, why it is not tolerated, and how to avoid it in the future. It is not a particularly complicated concept so ? am not sure what the problem is here, but block lengths will increase each time you edit war, you may end up getting indefinitely blocked if you keep doing it. I assume that is not what you want to see happen so I would ask you to take this time to read and understand the edit warring policy. Feel free to ask if you have any questions about it. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:36, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I am also concerned by your appeal. What you are calling vandalism looks like a fairly run of the mill content dispute to me. Wikipedia defines vandalism very narrowly and  I don't see how it applies to this situation. Vandalism is not just editing you disagree with, even if If you just know that the other user is wrong.  Beeblebrox (talk) 19:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I have been reviewing your contributions and it is seems pretty clear that you generally do not engage in discussion to deal with editing disputes. With all these posts on your talk page, you have only edited here five times and four of those were related to this block or the last one, with nothing in between.  You get in all these editing disputes, yet you hardly ever actually talk to the other user or users involved.  That is why you are blocked again. Next time discuss the issue, engage with the other users involved on the article talk page, ask for page protection if it is needed, try dispute resolution, anything except edit warring. Yes, it takes more time and effort to discuss than to blindly revert. That is how collaboration is supposed to work, when there are disagreements, you work them out and try to find a consensus, you don't just try and force the other person off. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:51, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Let me rephrase. I meant that these users are inserting false information. --Smartie2thaMaxXx (talk) 19:52, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Which refutes everything I've written above because??? Beeblebrox (talk) 19:53, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * These users keep deleting italics and adding information that shouldn't be there. Take a look-see. --Smartie2thaMaxXx (talk) 19:55, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Which part of the comment writen above by Beeblebrox do you not understand? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:43, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I do understand it all. It's a bit lengthy. --Smartie2thaMaxXx (talk) 20:45, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Here's the short version for you: Until you can show some understanding of the difference between reverting outright vandalism and using edit warring to try and get your way in a content dispute you can expect to keep getting blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:00, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

notice
i undid your edit to Pokemon Zoroark Master of illusions as that synopsis started off 10 minutes into the film. i realize that that's where the innitial Cartoon Network airing started, but this was done against PUSA's wishes, so in subsiquant airings and in the DVD release of the English Dub, the 10 minutes showing Ash and crew at the Pokemon Center as well as Mr. Kodai going to Unova to get Zoroark and Zorua as well as Zorua's escape were included. please do not remove it again, you may correct my spelling and such but do not remove that part again please and thank you. 199.101.61.190 (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

grammar
please do not attack me on my grammar, you don't need to delete it. if you like you can fix it but for shit sakes, don't delete it. again genius, Ash and them don't start off to Crown City untill 10 minutes into the film. you make it look like Kodai's trip to Unova, capture of Zoroark and Zorua and Zorua's escaping by tricking the Ninjask are unimportant. i know more about pokemon than you anyway, i've been on bulbapedia sinse 2010. 199.101.61.190 (talk) 17:35, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I am really hoping that at some point you will realize that edit warring is always the wrong thing to do. I don't know how many times this has to be explained to you or how many blocks it is going to take to get the message across, but I keep hoping... Beeblebrox (talk) 21:07, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

What? again? I don't mean to get into those edit wars. I'm trying to set things right, but you chew me out? What's wrong with you? --Smartie2thaMaxXx (talk) 21:58, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * You may not mean to get into edit wars, but you resort to it repeatedly whenever you disagree with an edit. You need to add some new tools to your editing toolbox. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Edit warring never sets anything right. As I have repeatedly tried to make clear to you it is always the wrong thing to do. it never sets anything straight, just causes problems. I don't know why you are having so much trouble grasping that concept but as I told you last time, you can expect to keep getting blocked, for longer and longer each time. Eventually you may end up indefinitely blocked. Nobody, including me, wants to see that happen so it would be a good thing if you took the time to review the edit warring policy (which I can only assume you still have not bothered to do) and try to exercise some self control  in the future. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:40, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

I know, I agree with you Beeblebrox and Ponyo. He's doing the same thing to me. Leave the Bret Iwan page alone for pete sake! Supermariokart64 (talk) 21:32, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

In general, communication is the key to avoiding conflict: follow Editing policy. Once it is clear that there is a dispute, avoid relying solely on edit summaries and discuss the matter on the article's talk page. The primary venue for discussing the dispute should be the article talk page, which is where a reviewing admin will look for evidence of trying to settle the dispute. It may help to remember that there is no deadline and that editors can add appropriate cleanup tags to problematic sections under current discussion. When discussion does not produce a conclusion, bringing wider attention to a dispute can lead to compromise. Consider getting a third opinion or starting a request for comments. Neutral editors aware of the dispute will help curb egregious edits while also building consensus about the dispute. When these methods fail, seek informal and formal dispute resolution.

Some experienced editors deliberately adopt a policy of only reverting edits covered by the exceptions listed above, or limiting themselves to a single revert; if there is further dispute they seek dialog or outside help rather than make the problem worse. They revert only when necessary. This policy may be particularly appropriate for controversial topics where views are polarized and emotions run high, and as a result edit warring is more frequent.

The bottom line: use common sense, and do not participate in edit wars. Rather than reverting repeatedly, discuss the matter with others; if a revert is necessary, another editor may conclude the same and do it (without you prompting them), which would then demonstrate consensus for the action. Request page protection rather than becoming part of the dispute by reverting.


 * I hope this helps. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:11, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Your recent editing history at James Bond filmography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Betty Logan (talk) 23:17, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I would like to make a proposal to you. It is based on an idea that has worked for other users that could not seem to restrain themselves from edit warring. What if you placed yourself under a voluntary one revert restriction? It seems to me you are an editor who is generally helpful and acting in good faith, but you keep letting yourself get into edit wars, which is no good for you or for Wikipedia. Here's how it would work:


 * If you see an edit that is not outright vandalism but you still disagree wit it you would revert it just once.
 * If the edit is restored you would not revert it again.
 * Instead you would open a discussion on the article's talk page and invite other users editing the page to talk about the edit in question.
 * If that doesn't work, you still don't revert again, you ask for some form of dispute resolution such as a third opinion or a posting at the noticeboard.


 * More than one user who has had similar issues with edit warring has managed to reform themselves in this manner. Every time you see a revert of yours being undone, remind yourself that you made a commitment to handle it the right way, without edit warring. You will feel better, you won't keep getting blocked, and articles will be improved. It's a positive situation all the way around. Does that sound like something you might want to do? Beeblebrox (talk) 04:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Did Disney still remains the Non-Home Entertainment distribution from the Miramax library?
Excuse me Smartie2thaMaxXx, did Disney still remains the Non-Home Entertainment distribution from the Miramax library? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.135.96.154 (talk) 04:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

It was the television distribution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.135.96.154 (talk) 04:29, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Jerry Mouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Stephenson


 * Tom Cat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Stephenson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

STOP vandalizing my talk page
STOP vandalizing my talk page! 140.104.8.93 (talk) 01:31, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You are of course not vandalizing that Talk page. But you're wasting time trying to reason with a WP vandal.  He'll be blocked soon enough; just let it go.  JohnInDC (talk) 02:11, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * With your permission, as soon as he's blocked, I intend to remove that entire Talk page exchange as needlessly offensive (not on your part). JohnInDC (talk) 02:13, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * He knows he's wrong. He's just baiting you, trying to get you to respond.  Don't give him the satisfaction!  If he changes the Nick page again - let it stay for the 10 minutes or so it will take the report at WP:AIV to get acted on.  Then one of us can change it to the right info.  JohnInDC (talk) 02:15, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * He probably still has Talk page access and so my advice to both of us is to take it off our Watchlists and let him carry on any way he wants to. It doesn't matter.  He's blocked and no matter what he may say, it's obvious that he's wrong.  By engaging with him - playing his game - you only descend to his level.  As do I!  So no more for me!  JohnInDC (talk) 02:26, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I know this is old and the user has been banned (for the right reasons), but despite what JohnInDC claims you were vandalizing my talk page. The problem is that JohnInDC is just too delusional to realize it. Deep down he knows he's wrong but just doesn't want to admit it and just gets down to your level with his nonsense and support of what you were doing. I was right and still am. Those are the facts and he just cannot accept that... The only thing I did wrong was descend to your levels by playing along with your posts... 140.104.115.20 (talk) 21:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

February 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Russi Taylor, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Cmckain14 (talk) 04:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Back to the Future (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Owen Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring on Bret Iwan
Your recent editing history at Bret Iwan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

This issue should be worked out on the talk page, not by a reversion war that may get you both blocked. On the merits, both of you might take note of the instructions at Template:Infobox person, where it states that the "Birth name" parameter should be used only if different from the name used in the "Name" parameter.--Arxiloxos (talk) 00:04, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Surfin' USA vs. Surfin' U.S.A.
Hey, I noticed you reverted my recent edits of Surfin' USA to Surfin' U.S.A. and I want to say that my edits aren't based without merit. The spelling of "USA" on the original LP sticker is consistent with my edits (http://www.koolkatjazz.com/catalog/images/denny%20m%20003.JPG) and in official sales audits conducted around the period of the record's release, "Surfin' U.S.A." was the name used (http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?content_selector=gold-platinum-searchable-database)

Hope this clears up any doubts you had towards my motives! Best regards, Jamekae (talk) 13:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cast
Template:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cast has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. oknazevad (talk) 04:18, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Saludos Amigos
Hi, I saw that in this edit you wrote that Clarence Nash voiced Donald Duck in the Portuguese version and José Oliveira voiced José Carioca in the Brazilian Portuguese version, suggestiong that you saw both versions. Is it true? And, if so, do you know who voiced Donald in the Brazilian Portuguese version and José in the Portuguese version? --Newblackwhite (talk) 23:53, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes, but what I don't understand is this. You wrote that Nash voiced the Portuguese version and Oliveira voiced the Brazilian Portuguese verion, as if the Portuguese version and the Brazilian Portuguese verion were two distinct versions. But if this is true, why can I only find one page in the Portuguese wiki? --Newblackwhite (talk) 00:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

I have found the Brazilian Portuguese version (Alô, Amigos) on youtube: part 1/4, part 2/4, part 3/4 and part 4/4. The first three segments have been redubbed, while the fouth segment used the original dub (in English), and therefore I am gonna remove Brazilian Portuguese from the versions voiced by José Oliveira. In the first segment Donald is voiced in Portuguese by Clarence Nash, while in part 3 Goofy's lines are not redubbed as they kept the original Pinto Colvig voice. I haven't find yet the Portuguese version (Olá, Amigos!), but if you are sure that Nash voiced both the Brazilian Portuguese and the European Portuguese version we should have both on the list (only the latter is listed now). Plus, I would like to find out whether Oliveira voiced the European Portuguese version or not. Maybe you know that? --Newblackwhite (talk) 18:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Creative Wonders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little Bear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Aladdin (1992 Disney film)
Changing the words does not prove that the Entertainment Weekly source claims he was the Merchant as I pointed out on the talk page This is all the sources says where William is concerned:
 * Quote 1: "and the studio knows it has the perfect lure in Robin Williams' vocal turn as the Genie, a big, blue, lamp-dwelling landmark in 'toon history."
 * Quote 2: "with Williams' mimicry. At the drop of a straight line — any line, really — the actor's uncorked alter ego contorts into impersonations of such boomer-generation icons as Arnold Schwarzenegger, Arsenio Hall, Groucho Marx (in black and white), Robert De Niro, Peter Lorre, and William F. Buckley Jr., who shows up to explain a few Latinate limitations on Aladdin's wishes."
 * Qoute 3: "While Katzenberg nourishes his staff's desire to show off for a more mature audience, he's also not about to abandon Disney's base: the little ones (an Aladdin Saturday-morning TV series is already under way, sans Williams)."

It needs to be removed that Robin Williams was the Merchant it is a false claim. Bruce Adler was more likely though voice as he sang for the Merchant but as Robin Williams can sing and performed "Friend Like Me" as the Genie I could see no reason why Disney would use someone else to sing for Robin Williams if he portrayed the Merchant. That does not make much sense. 184.58.22.86 (talk) 23:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Adventure Time
The episode you put on List of Adventure Time episodes does not have a source. Whoever made it up is falsely citing an old source. If you want to list this episode please find a reliable source, or do not waste your time. Ratemonth (talk) 01:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

"A better question to ask is 'Why shouldn't they be here?'"
(Regarding this) My answer would be because the dates those references are supporting have already passed, and happened, and they're a fact, or common knowledge now. The reasons those citations were there originally is because they were the only proof we had of those dates. But now they aren't really needed, unless you want an archival record saying "Oh, this used to be our proof." (Even though it's outdated now.) That's just my opinion. dogman15 (talk) 19:00, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Major film studio
A request has made to protection Major film studio that has been granted for your failure to note the discussion about Lionsgate at the articles talk page. Spshu (talk) 22:04, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry about everything dude. I'm not gona edit the video game section in the Dan Green article anymore. Sorry if I gave you a hard time, but I just want to let you know calling someone a "Worst Enemy" is not a good idea. You don't want to be ended up being block for calling someone that, I'm just letting you know about that. I'll leave you alone after this message. later and sorry about the editing thing. Bigshowandkane64 (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

I have a feeling that you won't accept my apology after this message. Bigshowandkane64 (talk) 20:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * As a reminder, Smartie, users are allowed to remove most content from their talk pages whenever they wish, with exceptions. None of the content you posted meets those exceptions, however. Secondly, it would have been better for you to re-format the good-faith attempt to provide a source for this edit instead of just deleting it. Lastly, please keep your interactions with other editors in a more civil tone ... some might say your edit here, especially the subhead title, crossed the line into incivility. I know I would, hence this polite reminder to tone down the rhetoric a few notches. Thanks. -- McDoob  AU93  23:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)