User talk:Smarty5

Hi,This is my Talk Page

Notability criteria
I've deleted Dinesh soi because it appears to be created out of disregard for a deletion discussion that already took place on the subject at Articles for deletion/Dinesh Soi. Article subjects have to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. Our general notability guideline states: If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. I advise you to become familiar with the guideline's specifics. There are other notability criteria which generally can be found via WP:NOTABILITY, though I doubt there are any specific guidelines for casting directors. Interviews cannot be used to establish notability, nor can passing mentions. That pretty much describes the entirety of the sources that were being used at Dinesh soi.

You should be aware that Wikipedia is not a vanity site, a social media platform or a vehicle for advertising. It is starting to look like you and/or some compatriots are trying to solidify an article on Dinesh Soi despite community consensus. This is not constructive and such behavior will certainly result in the revocation of editing privileges. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:21, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Repost of Vicky Kewat
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. ~ Ningauble (talk) 12:41, 20 June 2016 (UTC)