User talk:Smcdonough827/sandbox

Sean did a wonderful job summarizing the article before the author read it. You had all of the information highlighted in the summary before the actual content which made the article much easier to read. You had nice organization, great and clear way to breaking up your topics. I would write a bit more about activism since this is a main subject in your article. I would also add more of an opinion within your article whether its yours or someone else’s. You did a wonderful job siting and your table of contents is very clear and straight forward. You just overall need to add a bit more content to what you have here but you have a wonderful start.

I have emailed your peer review because the template does not show up here. -Jordyn

Hao Duong Peer Review
Lead Sentences: The beginning of the article with the information about Aisha Taymur, which has been helpful for me, who have not know about her. Content: As the reader, I found the content of the article really rich with information about Aisha Taymur from personal life to her works, activism, etc... Sources: The article is supported by a large amount of sources, which has really proved your credibility. Organization: The article is easy to follow and understand! I have an easy time to read, understand your article. Overall, I think you have done a really good job with your article, I enjoy reading it a lot1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.237.14.21 (talk) 18:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC)