User talk:Smdgejc

Welcome!
Hello, Smdgejc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 4 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 11:41, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Wikipedia:Wikiproject Women Wikipedia Design/Press page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=674513350 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F674513350%7CWikipedia:Wikiproject Women Wikipedia Design/Press%5D%5D Ask for help])

Justine Clark
We don't blank here. You may ask for removal according to a procedure, but not blank yourself.Xx236 (talk) 11:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karen Burns (academic)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Karen Burns (academic) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Eeekster (talk) 03:37, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Philip Goad does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Eeekster (talk) 03:38, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Karen Burns
Hi Smdgejc. Thanks for adding this interesting article to Wikipedia. I have been through it in some detail and undertaken quite a bit of copy editing. The information itself is well presented but there are a few items I should perhaps bring to your attention in the hope they will help you with future articles. The most important is overlinking. One wikilink (i.e. link to the heading of another article) per item is usually sufficient (except in very long articles when further linking may prove necessary). External links should be avoided in the running text but can of course be included in references. Do not hesitate to red-link important items deserving their own articles. Items in lists (of publications, conferences, awards, etc.) are usually introduced with asterisks. Wikipedia does not generally use titles (Dr, Professor, Sir) in the text of an article although some contributors add a title at the beginning. Most academic titles emerge from the text of the biography. It is important to add the category "Living people" where necessary and it is also common practice to add the year of birth and death if these are known: e.g. Category:1920 births, Category:1990 deaths. Finally, it is important to use the Defaultsort (immediately before the categories) to ensure the article is correctly listed (here Burns, Karen rather than Karen Burns). It might be useful to look through the edits as a guide for future contributions. I enjoyed reading your article and hope to see many more, especially during our drive to cover the important sphere of women in architecture. If ever you need any help, just let me know.--Ipigott (talk) 08:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your advice Ipigott The entry is a work in progress. Regarding overlinking – I had done this because earlier entries out group was involved with had had entries deleted apparently because of a lack of links, but I appreciate your advice. Thanks also for the advice on Defaultsort – I had actually just sent an email to our friendly local wikipedian asking how to do that. I will add the important external links into the references, and will also add in some red links. Smdgejc (talk) 09:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Glad I was able to be of assistance. I offered similar advice to the creator of Harriet Edquist. Perhaps you are working together. If you happen to know the people you are writing about, you could ask them to provide photographs for inclusion in the articles.--Ipigott (talk) 10:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, we were sitting together when the entries were written. I do have photos to upload – just need to work out how to do that! Smdgejc (talk) 10:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for participating in Women in architecture


Thank you for your participation in the Women in Architecture Virtual Edit-a-thon, 15–25 October 2015, sponsored by the Guggenheim Museum, and hosted by Women in Red. In addition to upgrades, we created about 170 new articles. Your contributions are appreciated! --Ipigott (talk) 15:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Naomi Stead


A tag has been placed on Naomi Stead requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 00:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Naomi Stead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catholic University of Leuven. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your work on Rosa T. Sheng. I think it's ready to be an article so I'm being bold and moving it to main wikispace. Would love to see more editors working on it. Josh Wallaert (talk) 07:43, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Architecture criticism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Architecture criticism, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Architecture criticism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)