User talk:SmileEveryday34/Looker Studio

Peer Review Feedback
Your article did an incredible job of breaking down the general functions of Looker Studio. I feel like because you were solely discussing elements of the site and it's functionality, there wasn't any opportunity for you to include personal bias, so you did a great job of keeping your voice neutral as possible. I like how you organized your additions and kept your paragraphs shorter so as to not seem intimidating or packed full of information -- I'll probably try to do this in my article more so that it's more readable for the user. I think the one thing I would suggest adding to your article is screenshots or images that demonstrate these different elements of Looker Studio; your additions act almost like a handbook, so having photos might help the user learn more effectively. Everything else looks really great! For the book citation, maybe manually create the citation for Wikipedia if the tool won't create it for you? Or try to cite the link? Good job! SmileEveryday34 (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Shae Wray: Information is plentiful but the layout is lacking. Try to widows in paragraphs (widows are when a paragraph ends with a single word on a single line, it just looks bad). Your Google Maps section stops mid-sentence so you should look into it. Sentence structure seems a bit flat and direct, try to add some more adjectives to make it more fun to read! You've got the information, now work with it. Saheforever (talk) 14:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your feedback! I'll try the manual citing tool for my eBook source so that all of my work is credible to add to the Wikipage. Also, I like your idea of adding pictures in each section to show users the elements that my paragraphs describe to help readers' understanding. SmileEveryday34 (talk) 14:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)