User talk:Smileupper09

Overprodding?
This account has now edited 16 articles, and several of those edits have been prod and notability taggings. Seeing the pattern, it's difficult not to suspect bad faith editing or sock-puppeting. As per notability, I suggest you read Notability before proceeding with such taggings. For example, Mahi B. Chowdhury is clearly notable and it doesn't take more than 10 second google search to confirm that. If you are unsure of notability, do a google search yourself before addinng a notability tag. As per prods, they are better used when it comes to uncontroversial deletion. Generally, it is advisable to use WP:AFDs. --Soman (talk) 10:03, 15 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Google Hit is not an acceptable term for Wikipedia unfortunately. Improve the artcile with reliable sources if you can.--Smileupper09 (talk) 00:59, 18 December 2009 (UTC)


 * You miss the point. All articles need references, and any unreferenced article can (and should) be tagged with refimprove. But not all unreferenced articles are inherently non-notable. Before tagging an article for notability concerns, try checking notability yourself. In some cases it can be difficult to establish notability, but in the concrete case of Mahi B. Chowdhury it would have been extremly simple. --Soman (talk) 09:31, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the tips that I exercised right now on the article. But if you fail to improve the article with reliable online sources within 7 days, I would make the artcile on AFD for sure; so Work Hard on it!--Smileupper09 (talk) 10:45, 20 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I have added the requested references. --Ragib (talk) 06:29, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Fact tags
Hi, if an article does not cite any sources whatsoever, please consider adding unreferenced to the top, rather than CN, fact or other variations on every unsourced statement. Also, if the article is a biography of a living person (BLP), it's usually a good idea to use BLPunsourced. If it desparately needs more or better refs, you can use refimprove or BLPsources respectively, though use your discretion on these. Better still, you're welcome to try and help the project out by trying to locate sources- we currently have 52,674 unreferenced BLPs, some of which might be quite easy to find sources for in Google and Google news. Anyhow, you're doing a good job (careful with the templates though!). Let me know if you need any help or anything! Happy new year, HJMitchell    You rang?   01:47, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your suggestions regarding fact tags. Wish you a happy new year too!--Smileupper09 (talk) 13:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)