User talk:Smileymo123

Speedy deletion nomination of Nut Inc.


A tag has been placed on Nut Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 16:13, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Talk:Nut Inc."
A page you created, Talk:Nut Inc., has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Onewhohelps (talk) 16:18, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Regarding Nut Inc.
I've deleted your page on Nut Inc., and just wanted to respond to the contested deletion comments you left on the talk page. Although Nut Inc. may be similar to Windows, Ubuntu, etc., it does not seem to meet the requirements for inclusion in Wikipedia. First of all, there seems to be no evidence that Nut Inc. is notable. There is little content on Nut Inc. in a quick Google search, which suggests little independent coverage of the OS. Furthermore, the tone of the article is very promotional.

You have a conflict of interest with the subject of this article. Generally speaking, it's best to avoid editing articles with which you are closely affiliated. It's best to wait until the OS becomes notable enough that an uninvolved editor creates the article. Please do leave me a message if you have any questions. Cheers! – GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Please respond either here or on my talk page, not on the talk page of the deleted article. The basic indication of Nut Inc.'s notability is the depth of coverage in independent, reliable sources (newspapers, magazines, other news sources, academic journals, etc.) For example, if there are multiple sources that significantly review Nut, Inc., that is a good indication of its notability. There is little you personally can do to increase the number of independent articles on your OS, as that is generally up to the editorial team of the source. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * As I have already explained, the article is not suitable for inclusion until you can show that it meets the notability guideline. Disregarding this and continuing to upload the article without showing notability is disruptive and can result in a block. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:07, 22 September 2011 (UTC)