User talk:SmilingFace

A welcome from Andy Shen
Hi,, Welcome  to Wikipedia! I'm Andy Shen. I noticed that you were new and/or have yet to receive any messages so I just thought I'd pop in to say "hello". We're glad to have you in our community! I hope you like this place &mdash; I sure do &mdash; and want to stay. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it's so big but we won't bite so Be Bold and get what you know down in microchips! If you do make a mistake, that's fine, we'll assume good faith and just correct you: it'll take a few seconds maximum! Here, however, are a few links to get you started:


 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary

---

Additional tips
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!


 * I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
 * You may want to add yourself to the new user log.
 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
 * If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
 * If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
 * P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Happy Wiki-ing.
- Andy Shen

Messianic Judaism
I don't think you got to edit the MJ page the way you wanted to. If you are still interested, please feel free to do so. Rivka 18:10, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Shine, Jesus, Shine
No, I don't mind. (I'll go ahead and remove it myself). I just added that because it was the first album I was familiar with that contained the song. Sorry about that. WAVY 10 15:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Just so you know
Re rearley indef. block IP's, that's because they could be shared by multiple people.  Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake)  22:48, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, your AIV report had to be removed because the guy only got one warning. You've got to put warnings on their talk page, they are:

Try that next time

Overuse of Minor edit box
I just had a quick glance at a few of your edits. I think that you are overusing the minor edit box. This, in no way, suggests I disagree with your edits. I just think that many exceed the standard of "requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." I hope you'll review the guidelines. Novangelis (talk) 19:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

The Show preview button
I noticed your edit which caused the Megachurch article to be accidentally redirected. Are you aware of the Show preview button? I have found this to be a great help when I am unsure how my changes will be presented. I hope this helps. Regards LittleOldMe (talk) 12:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Neo-evangelicalism
I do object to recreating the merged article. It will recreate the defects then considered.

Neither article (nor an editor) could indicate the significance of the term neo-evangelicalism v. evangelicalism. I believe I have the idea now but if I do it seem to be a term now used among certain groups. I recommend you improve Evangelicalism with a Neo-evangelicalism section, if you can, while keeping the overlap and difference in these two terms clear. Once you have done this-- if it seems warranted-- then propose to split out the Neo-evangelicalism section into an separate article. This will be the best serve to the reader.--Carlaude (talk) 14:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Michael Perry
Thanks for starting an article on Michael Perry (hymnwriter). I found it after reading about him in a magazine, and have expanded it using the sources you provided. If you start any more articles that will need expanding, it's worth adding a suitable stub template; see Category:Stub categories. Best wishes, Fayenatic (talk) 14:03, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Interesting, I have no recollection of starting it, but the history confirms I did! Glad to have helped. Sidefall (talk) 10:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ben niddah
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ben niddah. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Ben niddah. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Spastic
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Spastic. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Spastic. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Televangelism
Hi, would you mind taking a look at the Televangelism article? Namely the edits done by the anon that precede mine. I already removed one POV/bias statement from it, but suspect other damage may have been done as well. This topic is not one I can claim any real knowledge on, and I see that you've made some large contributions to the article, so I was hoping you'd see what else I missed that the anon shouldn't have changed (IF anything).

IF you do need to revert all his additions (and thus mine as well), please of course feel free - mine was only a small fix, BLPish in nature until I could find someone more knowledgeable about the article. Just of course don't revert-vandal me. ;-) Best, Robert R OBERT M FROM LI  TALK/CNTRB 23:55, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

AFD
An article you have edited, Jonathan Stephen is under AFD.I.Casaubon (talk) 21:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:John Stott.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:John Stott.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:JohnStott.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JohnStott.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Archiving sources
Hi, it's interesting that we meet again! Thanks for good work on the article that you re-created. As some of the links are liable to disappear – and at least one that I restored today already has – I recommend you to check http://archive.org and http://www.webcitation.org/query to see if they have been archived, and if not then archive them at http://www.webcitation.org

We should also stick to summarising what's already published in reliable sources. Some of the current content is probably crossing the line WP:No original research. – Fayenatic  L ondon 18:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, it's interesting to come across you again, and thanks for your good work as well. I have used archive.org in some of my previous editing, and I'll see what I can do to archive links with webcitation - I agree that some of them may disappear. I have tried to comply with all policies - I'd be interested to know what you think might be over the WP:NOR line as I did make an effort not to go beyond what's in the sources. That said, someone could argue that some of the refs breach WP:BLPSPS but we'll just have to wait and see if it gets brought up. Best wishes, SmilingFace (talk) 19:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

List of scandals
I have reverted your page move because (a) I don't agree with it, and (b) I don't think my move counts as "recent" per WP:RM/TR. So, perhaps you can suggest a move at Requested moves. Alternatively, you could start and RfC regarding the scope of the article. I'm sure we both agree that the name should match the scope. StAnselm (talk) 07:53, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * By the way, you should read Articles for deletion/Christian evangelist scandals, if you haven't already done so. The original article name was Christian televangelist scandals, which does, perhaps, have an American flavor. StAnselm (talk) 07:59, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * But looking over your edit history, I see you've edited the page a fair bit. Welcome back to Wikipedia. StAnselm (talk) 08:01, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, let's continue on the article talk page - it seems a much better place. SmilingFace (talk) 08:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You say you don't want to get into an edit war, but you have already broken the three-revert rule with four edits in the space of half an hour. Please consider self-reverting. StAnselm (talk) 13:35, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool update
Hey SmilingFace. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 22:09, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Sound devices
The deleted article was all of one sentence long, to the effect of "Sound devices is a company that makes audio equipment, like speakers and headphones." - I could give you the deleted copy, but you might as well start over. Wily D 08:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carpenter's Home Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Auburndale. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ludlum Measurements
Hello SmilingFace,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ludlum Measurements for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. schetm (talk) 23:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of LND Inc


A tag has been placed on LND Inc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Finngall talk  21:28, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of David L. Jones for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David L. Jones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David L. Jones (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 15:14, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Future large aircraft listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Future large aircraft. Since you had some involvement with the Future large aircraft redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Douglas Self
Hello SmilingFace,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Douglas Self for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dschslava (talk) 20:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Douglas Self
I've moved your new attempt to User:SmilingFace/Douglas Self. You need sources that are independent. Companies which sell or promote his works (such as this source or this one) are not independent. This source starts to come close, but there's still the problem that it's about his book and not him. You need sources that are independent of him, but specifically about him.

The purpose in moving an article to user space is so that you can make sure it is finished before putting it into article space. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:47, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Is it worth mentioning his interest in steam engineering too, particularly his website on steam loco technology, particularly the more obscure corners of it? He's regularly cited throughout WP. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Assuming it's the same person, that would provide more potential sources. It could even be possible that he's notable for his work in steam engineering, and from there the article could also mention his work in acoustics (or the other way around).  Ian.thomson (talk) 23:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Of course it's the same person, it's Doug Self, he's pretty bloody famous! Andy Dingley (talk) 23:33, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's the same person, but his steam interest is a hobby so probably hasn't received any media attention. Andy, do you know otherwise? SmilingFace (talk) 23:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Here are some citations that may help with establishing notability as well as providing more content.

Cavrdg (talk) 09:22, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas G. Burton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Christian blogosphere


A tag has been placed on Christian blogosphere requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Status and Advice

 * you will find it at Draft:Christian Blogosphere. Please, next time, follow the proper procedure--the deleting admin will most of the time give a satisfactory answer, and if not, there's Deletion Review, which will get attention from some of the people who work most with deletion processes. (And, to avoid problems in the first place. please do not press save on a mainspace article until you have added at least one potentially reliable source; it is not a formal requirement, but it is usually effective at preventing inappropriate deletion.)  DGG ( talk ) 23:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of The Wartburg Watch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Wartburg Watch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Wartburg Watch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StAnselm (talk) 19:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The most effective argument you can make is to expand the article. Cheers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Reminder about sources
Forum posts are not reliable sources. You cannot add material to Tony Anthony (evangelist) based only on a forum post and an unverified document sharing site. If the information is worth mentioning, cite where it's been mentioned in the press or other reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 19:19, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * With respect, WP:RS does not apply to this situation. The discussion forum is being referenced as the medium through which the leaking was announced. There is a similar line that has been present in the article for a long time: Users of a martial arts website also began to doubt Anthony's story, starting in 2007. That again is a reference to a discussion forum. In both these cases, the forum content is not being used as a basis for article content about Mr Anthony. Rather, these are matters of historic record that are acceptable on WP. But I will reword my addition to make it clear that the document is not verified. SmilingFace (talk) 19:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Whether or not WP:RS applies in this case, WP:BLP does. That is very clear that information about a living person should not be added to an article without reliable sources, and contentious material should have very solid sources to support it. While it is possible that the forum could be used to support the statement that forum members believe they have found a leaked document, that's the only thing it can support. We should absolutely not be linking to an alleged leaked document based on a forum post alone. —C.Fred (talk) 20:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

List of satirical news websites
Please create wikipedia articles for satirical websites before adding to "List of satirical news websites". Thanks in advance. • Sbmeirow  •  Talk  • 10:49, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Iain D. Campbell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iain D. Campbell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Iain D. Campbell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StAnselm (talk) 09:51, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Elizabeth Esther
Hello, SmilingFace,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Elizabeth Esther should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Esther.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Rentier (talk) 22:06, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Christianity magazine sept 2013.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Christianity magazine sept 2013.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Roger Kastel
Hello, SmilingFace,

Thanks for creating Roger Kastel! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:10, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Category:Blogs about Christians and Christianity has been nominated for discussion
Category:Blogs about Christians and Christianity, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reckless Love (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Piper ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Reckless_Love_%28song%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Reckless_Love_%28song%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

OVERLINKING—IMPORTANT
Hi, thanks for your work, BUT ... we don't normally link common terms. See this edit I've just done. Tony (talk)  04:13, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Copyright problem on The Making of Biblical Womanhood
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://bethallisonbarr.com/books/, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 19:59, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

I also found copyright issues in Kristin Kobes Du Mez. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 23:49, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)