User talk:Smirkybec/Archives/2016/October

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We'd like to invite you to participate in a user study closely related to SuggestBot. User:Another Article is seeking to understand more about the workflow and time commitment of contributors to the English Wikipedia. As part of this study you will occasionally be prompted to answer questions about your editing activity, and these questions should never take more than a minute or two to complete. The intended length of the study is two weeks, but your actual time commitment is totally up to you. If you would like to see more details you can read the project proposal at Research:Measuring editor time commitment and workflow (on meta), but if you are feeling bold and would like just like to sign up right now you can add the line  to your. Contact User:Another Article if you have any questions about this study!

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

To do list
I have a link to your list as well...there were a couple that interested me.. But you can see my to do list here with any notes - some of them I can find nothing about. User:Antiqueight/Draft  &#9749;  Antiqueight  haver 16:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I think Barbara Gage should probably be a redirect to a section in the Catherine Gage article, I was barely able to find that amount about Catherine and I don't think it will be much more than that. I'll see if any of the others are in Butler's book, though it won't have any of the living artists. I also have her book on watercolourists, so I'll check that too. When I get properly stuck back into editing after the PhD, I'll start looking to books in Trinity and in journals again.Smirkybec (talk) 16:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Quite probably - I think I was able to find the peerage details and that was about it. My resource is basically online. If I can access it from here it stands a chance of being used. Otherwise - it's unlikely. I did all my hands on research in my youth. I'm very lazy now.  &#9749;  Antiqueight  haver 16:38, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

PhD
When do you hear about the first draft and what needs rewriting? Are you here til that has to be done?  &#9749;  Antiqueight  haver 16:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not a 100% sure, but hopefully not too long, a few weeks maybe? I'll probably dip in and out, still have some other things to be getting on with as well :) Aiming to get those red links filled in on those Irish botanical artists anyway! Smirkybec (talk) 17:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

An invitation to November's events
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 18:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Patrick Whelan - 1916
Hi Smirkybec

Enjoyed tutorial very much, thank you.

Any word on the notability issue regarding Patrick Whelan?

Kind regards

Helen Larkin (talk) 20:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)