User talk:Smite-Meister

Apology
Sorry about mixing up the crypto page list. Your edit looks like it was the correct move. - Sidelight 12 Talk 13:29, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Removal of commercial links
Can you please discuss your recent edits in the talk page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DE logics (talk • contribs) 09:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Your speedy on Quark Coin.
I removed it and replaced with a discussion for deletion located here on the basis that it looks different from it's deleted counterpart. [ citation needed  ] 22:46, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Invitation on Cryptocurrency debate.
Since you seem to be heavily involved in the area, I would like your opinion on potential new standards regarding altcoins on Wikipedia. You can find the debate at Talk:Cryptocurrency. Best regards, Citation Needed  &#x007C;  Talk  20:14, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

I would also like to join a talk on this said subject. It appears there are some disputes between editors, and we might want to standardize a little. KR 15:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevoras (talk • contribs)

Wiki links in headings
We do not generally do this Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 19:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Edit Warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. This is a warning for edit warring. You are adding the same content and   being reverted by two editors. Take it to the talk page and seek consensus, the reliable sources noticeboard, you have lots of options. But edit warring is the wrong approach. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 19:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)