User talk:Smith, Chelsea

Context !!!
It is totally pointless posting exactly the same thing at Palex. You must start by giving context - what is it: a play, a book, a film? And you must provide independent evidence thast it is notable. -- RHaworth 05:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

The above was too encouraging. The article is a totally unwanted fork and probaly a copyvio. Please stop trying to post it. -- RHaworth 16:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Palex
A "" template has been added to the article Palex, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~Matticus TC 13:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. The Rambling Man 16:15, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

August 2007
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, South of Nowhere. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you. TheLetterM 14:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

May 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to June 13 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)