User talk:Smith6210

File source problem with File:Executive.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Executive.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NtheP (talk) 17:00, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Smith6210/Western Bible College has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Western Bible College, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 17:53, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Barbschulz.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Barbschulz.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:21, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:WBCGroup.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:WBCGroup.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Executive.jpg
I think we can summise that you didn't take the photo yourself as you are now indicating you have permission from the college to use the photo. If this is the case then the comments made above about File:Barbschulz.jpg apply here. The college need to send an email giving permission for the photo to be used. NtheP (talk) 20:52, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jarkeld (talk) 00:22, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Western Bible College concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Western Bible College, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Western Bible College


Hello Smith6210. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Western Bible College.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 21:00, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Affiliation/connection query
Hi Smith6210, Please state what connection or affiliation, if any, you have to the website http://waterwelders.com, and the author of articles on that site, Matt Smith. Thank you, &bull; &bull; &bull; Peter (Southwood) (talk): 06:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Peter,

I'm the creator of Water Welders, and I've written the vast majority of the articles on the site. I've edited every article to meet my specifications as an online journalist. The site is education-focused, with an emphasis on the topic of underwater welding. Can you please help me understand why my notation was deleted on the hyperbaric welding article? The citation links to an authoritative source that represents a compilation of interviews and inquiries from commercial divers, diving schools, maritime businesses and research. Smith6210 (talk) 08:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Ah, my apologies. Upon further reading, I see that this information was moved to a more appropriate location further down in the article.Smith6210 (talk) 08:34, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Emasculation has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Emasculation was changed by Smith6210 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956723 on 2016-01-03T06:25:34+00:00.

Hyperbaric welding
I've just reverted your edit to Hyperbaric welding. Wikipedia doesn't use bold for emphasis, but uses it to draw attention to the title of the article at its first mention in the text. This convention is explained at MOS:BOLD, where you'll see that bold is also applied to "terms that are redirected to the article or its sub-sections". In this case Underwater welding is a redirect to Hyperbaric welding and so it has its first mention in bold as well. The reason for that is readers may arrive at the article having either searched for, or followed a link to "Underwater welding" and the bold assures them that they have arrived at the correct place (even though the article has a different title from the one they were expecting). Hope that helps. --RexxS (talk) 19:09, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:WBCGroup.jpg


The file File:WBCGroup.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)