User talk:Smithwalker

Vipac Engineers & Scientists
Hello, You recently created the page Vipac Engineers & Scientists, which appears to be written in a tone similar to that of an advertisement. Though we appreciate all contributions to Wikipedia, please remember to keep your edits objective! Spencer.mccormick (talk) 02:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vipac Engineers & Scientists


A tag has been placed on Vipac Engineers & Scientists, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Track IQ™
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Track IQ™, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://trackiq.net/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 01:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Track IQ™


Hello Smithwalker. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Track IQ™".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:38, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gas Technology Services (GTS)


Hello, Smithwalker. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Gas Technology Services (GTS)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:22, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Autotest concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Autotest, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Autotest


Hello, Smithwalker. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Autotest".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 02:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Vipac for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vipac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vipac until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 12:58, 30 July 2017 (UTC)