User talk:Smnananm/sandbox

Rachel's peer review
Hi Sam!

So I think that you have a really good grip on what you want to do with this article. I agree that it reads like a dictionary page rather than an informative article. The slang terms are useful but expanding on the historical and cultural backgrounds of it would definitely improve it. I also think in general the beginning summary of the article/topic should be longer. I also definitely agree with your critique that the article is very gay-male centric and US/UK centric which leaves out entire populations of people who used or still use this language. I think you're going in a really good direction with the article, just make sure you find reliable sources to back those additions up; it seems like reliable info might be hard to find :(