User talk:Smoe

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

-Poli (talk &bull; contribs) 21:03, 2005 July 26 (UTC)

Quantitative trait gene: suggested merge
Hi, you seem to be the only other editor of quantitative trait gene. I suggested it be merged with Quantitative trait locus, which is a more commonly used term for the same thing. Let me know what you think on the talk page, otherwise expect me to do the merge within the next few days. Cheers, - Samsara contrib talk 12:44, 11 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the comment on my talk, and sorry to take so long to get back. I mean, yes, "gene" could imply that the transcript, translation product and function are known; on the other hand, "gene" does also refer to a physical location on the chromosome, which is a locus. As you know, a locus is as small or large as you want it to be, even a single nucleotide, which is what QTL ultimately usually map to, unless you're dealing with an unusually polymorphic population, e.g. balancing selection (which is unlikely for a quantitative trait, where each locus/gene has a small effect).
 * Now, suppose that to the resolution of your QTL mapping, you had found a candidate region that actually harbours more than one gene containing a polymorphism relevant to the expression of the trait. In this case, I doubt you would be very interested in disentangling the effects, because it is likely that on your timescale of interest, the various QTG segregated together! So unless you were interested in studying the details of the underlying metabolism, or in eugenic manipulation, the difference between a QTG and candidate region containing several QTG would be fairly irrelevant.
 * Does that make a stronger case for merging? - Samsara contrib talk 03:33, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eurospeak
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Eurospeak, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rob Banzai (talk) 21:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)