User talk:Smoncrief/sandbox

The lead section does have an adequate introductory section that allows for the reader to understand what this article is about. It also includes a description of the articles major section which allows for the reader to know the duties of the department of lands. It has been clear that the lead has been updated from its original content to demonstrate more factual information about the article. The lead is neat and gives the right amount of information for the reader to understand what the article is about without having too much information added to the lead.

Everything added to this article is exactly what needs to be in the article; job duties and different section that are overseen by the Idaho Department of Lands. All of the information is brought to the reader on a neutral, yet factual standpoint, which is how it should be stated in this article. Nothing is overstated or even understated. In this article they talk about each point or section within this article and then explain what each of these sections are and give you an understanding of why they felt it was necessary to add this into the article. Each of the contents that were added to this article are up to date, nothing is far fetched or seems to unrealistic, its neutral toned, with no evidence to support the fact that they are trying to persuade an argument or their point through any bias arguments whatsoever.

When it comes to sources, they cited where information needed to be cited as well as having 6 references that are trustworthy for information they used to be backed up in this article. Each of the links for the references works and are up to date and give thorough information to back up this article.

This article is well written, structured great, and organized to the point where it shows a direction of where the article is going and doesn't leave you lost or confused on what the authors are trying to tell the readers. With every claim or factual information, they have a cited link next to it allowing for trust and knowledge that they do, in fact have trustworthy information. There seems to be no grammar issues or spelling errors. The content is broken down into sections to help the reader fully understand each role within the Idaho Department of Lands.

There seems to be no content that relates to pictures or visuals so I will not be commenting on the "Images and media" section in the peer review.

From what I have read in this sandbox, it is clear that what information is in this sandbox will overall benefit the actual article quality and also allowing for the article to be more complete. The strengthens of this article are demonstrated by not just explaining each part of the duties and responsibilities of the Idaho Department of Lands, but to section out each of them to show exactly what each of these sectioned duties do within the department. The only thing I can see that can be added for improvement, and not to say it even needs to be added, but to allow for more information, to talk about the individuals within this department. Who is in charge, what have they done to contribute to this department, some of the departments accomplishments, or some of the things that this departments done to benefit the State of Idaho. Other than than, I this that this article is great! Peer Reviewed by, EthanFDavis (talk) 19:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

The introductory part of the article is good. The information has been added which was missing in the wiki article. One thing is that some sentences are not linked to each other. Add a few lines to make it a bit more coherent. Add more information about the article if you can find it. Like history, Administration of IDL, significant members, their funding, statistics, current standing and some of the projects they did etc. The tone is neutral, well-organized but needs more sections (information). The links are working and mostly from the official website. Overall, it’s good. The sources that were cited has a lot of information which could also be included. Peer Reviewed by, JaveriaZ (talk) 19:33, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Javeria