User talk:SmoothieFacePvP

March 2013
Hello, I'm Webclient101. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to William Wang, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Webclient101 talk 03:18, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William Wang with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Webclient101 talk 03:18, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to William Wang with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Webclient101 talk 03:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to William Wang. Webclient101 talk 03:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:25, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/SmoothieFacePvP for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 22:40, 12 March 2013 (UTC)