User talk:Smp63

Welcome!
Hello, Smp63, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Dengvaxia controversy does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Shibboleth ink (♔ ♕) 19:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Dengvaxia controversy, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. ''The source (and many others like it) support the idea that the Dengvaxia controversy has created a problem for vaccination efforts. You may disagree that most vaccines are beneficial, but the scientific literature supports their use. On wikipedia, we present information that is verifiable in the highest quality available sources, not what we think is the "true" version of the information. This is what protects us from bias!-- Shibboleth ink (♔ ♕) 19:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)''

Hi Smp63! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Dengvaxia controversy that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. ''The minor edits checkbox is for small things, like grammar or spelling or punctuation. Not for making substantive changes to content. Please do not misuse this edit summary feature!''  Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 22:37, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

There is no evidence of OR on my behalf. I don't think you understand what OR is. I rephrased the original article to remove bias. It really is true that this site has become ruined by left-wing bias. You really are too far gone if you can't see how biased you are. Smp63 (talk) 07:46, 8 August 2021 (UTC)