User talk:Sms45

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Academic Challenger 21:08, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Redirect
The way that I am changing to is correct. If you change it back it will not work.--Anthony.bradbury 20:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Rafiqul Islam Bhuiyan
Your recent edit to Rafiqul Islam Bhuiyan (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 22:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Please, do not repost text previously subjected to deletion. It is considered a form of vandalism. Nehwyn 19:54, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Fourth Culture Kid
I have proposed this article for deletion. --Brianyoumans 00:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

About Jusmeet Virmani
Sms45, for the second time I have to caution you not to repost articles previously subjected to deletion. Please, abstain from further attempts. Nehwyn 20:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Your repost of Rafiqul Islam Bhuiyan
Sms45, you have reposted the above-mentioned page for the sixth time. You were warned that this constitutes vandalism before, so let's put it like this:

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nehwyn 17:40, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Shyam Goel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shyam Goel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shyam Goel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 13:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)