User talk:Smurrayinchester

{| style="text-align:left; border:0px outset #99FFBB; background-color:#00DD77; -moz-border-radius: 15px;"
 * colspan=3 style= "text-align:center;background:#007722; color:white;-moz-border-radius: 15px;"|Contents
 * - padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;"

Merge proposal
Hi, if you want to propose merging two articles you need to put the merge template on both articles and have them both point to a section on the destination article's talk page that gives your reasons why they should be merged so others can comment - see wp:merging. Richerman   (talk) 22:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Open–closed political spectrum
Mifter (talk) 00:02, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of Bamber Bridge
Vanamonde (talk) 01:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Government News Network


The article Government News Network has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Notability (media) and Notability (websites)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 22:36, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Homepage?
Congratulations on the promotion to FA status of your Northern England article. I think it would make for an excellent article on the home page. I think you should propose it at WP:TFAR. I will certainly support it. Best, Edwininlondon (talk) 20:51, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Have nominated it here Today's featured article/requests/Northern England. Smurrayinchester 08:26, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Northern England scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Northern England article has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 4, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/September 4, 2017, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for "an increasingly distinctive cultural area, shaped by centuries of Celtic, Roman, Saxon, Danish, Norman and Scottish invasion and more recently by the rise and fall of heavy industry"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election
I've nominated this article for deletion. As a contributor, your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election. Robofish (talk) 22:57, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey
Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Irene Clennell
Hello! Your submission of Irene Clennell at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Irene Clennell case
— Maile (talk) 12:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Airlift, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supplies ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Airlift check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Airlift?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

DYK for GRIM test
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Two years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

... and three --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:28, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NSB Di 8, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Steel ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/NSB_Di_8 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/NSB_Di_8?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission of Alem Bekagn at the Did You Know nominations page
Hello! Your submission of Alem Bekagn at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Farang Rak Tham (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States federal government shutdown of 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Standard Time ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/United_States_federal_government_shutdown_of_2018 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/United_States_federal_government_shutdown_of_2018?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK for AU Conference Center and Office Complex
Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Alem Bekagn
Hello! Your submission of Alem Bekagn at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Alem Bekagn
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society
Dear ,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evrik (talk • contribs) 14:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

DYK for July 1968 England and Wales dust fall storms
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

List organisations in the United Kingdom with a royal charter listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List organisations in the United Kingdom with a royal charter. Since you had some involvement with the List organisations in the United Kingdom with a royal charter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:26, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Independent Group
Hello. You moved the Independent Group DAB page to the main title, and the art movement article to a disambiguated title. However, you've left all the incoming links for the art movement pointing at the DAB page. Could you please fix them all? You can see the list here. Cheers, Number   5  7  13:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular
   

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:29, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:EACherryicecream.JPG


The file File:EACherryicecream.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Bad edit of Image:Cherryicecream.jpg for the now-defunct Esperanza group. Not necessary."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Let Nature Sing
Hello! Your submission of Let Nature Sing at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:47, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Let Nature Sing
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Lemony Snicket
Template:WikiProject Lemony Snicket has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 09:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

The Like-Minded Persons' Club
Well done. Keep it up. Cheers. --  Jack of Oz   [pleasantries]  11:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Sarbecovirus
Hi, did you think about renaming Severe_acute_respiratory_syndrome-related_coronavirus into sarbecovirus ? This would make it clearer and more accurate with respect to the scientific literature (look at page 7). Sarbcovirus is a "subgenus" of the genus betacoronavirus. Reuns (talk) 14:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. For what it's worth, I went with Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus as the title because that's the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses nomenclature for the species. That said, it looks like Sarbecovirus taxonomy is currently a mess (there's no current distinction between Sarbecovirus and the SARS-related coronavirus species) and it seems perfectly plausible to me that when this is all over there will be a reorganisation that puts SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 in different species under Sarbecovirus. This probably needs input from people who know more than me at Talk:Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus. Smurrayinchester 14:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * User:Smurrayinchester I'm not saying Sars-related doesn't exist in the taxonomy, but according to https://talk.ictvonline.org/taxonomy/ it is the only "species" of the subgenus sarbecovirus,

Riboviria › Nidovirales › Cornidovirineae › Coronaviridae › Orthocoronavirinae › Betacoronavirus › Sarbecovirus › Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
 * so it would make it clearer to group Sars-Cov, Sars-Cov-2, Bat_SARS-like_coronavirus_WIV1 into the sarbecovirus subgenus (the article doesn't exist yet, all we have to do is to rename Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus and edit its Taxobox) Reuns (talk) 15:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/Italy medical cases chart
Why "Putting a footnote inside the percentage breaks the chart"? I see the chart correctly, so maybe it changes with browsers? Can we put it in some other place? --151.48.13.156 (talk) 10:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * On Firefox, it seems to cause the bracket after the percentage to appear on the next line, making that row twice as wide. Smurrayinchester 12:31, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Relevance fallacies
Template:Relevance fallacies has been nominated for merging with Template:Formal fallacies. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 13:39, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Oxford Circus panic
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus


Hello, Smurrayinchester. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:14, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Wombat.svg


The file File:Wombat.svg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image, is widely distributed on the Internet, no proof that the uploader is author."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Live laugh love
Hi there, with the recent page move made, can you please take care to fix all of the Clay Walker related links to the new article location? Thanks. DLManiac (talk) 07:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. They should all be fixed now. Smurrayinchester 12:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Photography game
—valereee (talk) 00:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Need help for creation of finance and business pages.
Dear fellow Wikipedian, Despite having been off Wikipedia for sometime now, I am coming back with a few specific ideas in mind for which I may need to get help and advice. I am looking to create a few Wikipedia pages about various financial institutions which are quite high in notability but have not yet been covered, however, despite my experience and my knowledge of the field, I am new to this kind of content.

Therefore, I am looking for other, recognized editors that I could consult in case I need help or advice if I encounter roadblocks during my endeavor. I would need to get advice from someone who is well versed in the fields of finance and business.

Let me know if you could help me with this task and if not, let me know if you know someone on wikipedia that would be the go to person to help with such matters ? I am trying to contact a few administrators who seem to be highly competent in those fields but am currently having a hard time finding someone. Thanks in advance, SUPERGTOR (talk) 03:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Please see the reply that I left at User talk:Legoktm -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 14:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Help me
I need help with editing protection templates around my data. Realme233 (talk) 17:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Black-green coalition
Hello, Smurrayinchester. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Black-green coalition, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:57, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Preparing for Emergencies.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:Preparing for Emergencies.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Criminal convictions
Being questioned is not a criminal conviction, receiving an FPN is not a criminal conviction, and under caution is not the same as receiving a caution. You need to be much more careful when editing in WP:BLP areas. DuncanHill (talk) 09:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Nargess Eskandari-Grünberg
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for a good one, featured also on Portal:Germany. Opera and Advent choral music on my talk --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:36, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)


 * }

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:22, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Greetings - note on the mods to Northern England.
Respectfully, rather than dropping a template on you - I'd like to explain things in my own words. Thanks for the clean up on Northern England.

I do think you removed language was useful - and terms like generally, perhaps, maybe - are not encyclopedic.

You seem a very experienced editor - so I do not think I need to push on this. I was actually surprised you left the language in the article.

I think the article has fundamental problems - I added citations as to the sources of where the area is - and I added the gov. regional refs months ago. They are administrative areas and they have changed frequently. The lack of citations was noted 'years' ago- but no editor has ever addressed them.

Some of this is also nebulous and editorialized as are many articles of this nature about this region.

I think these are certainly not contentious matters - again, looking at your excellent contributions - I was a little surprised at these edits.

Respectfully: Dr.BeingObjective (talk) 15:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the message. I admit I'm a bit confused. I removed almost no text from the article (If you're worried about the "Historically, there has been a significant challenge in defining what geographies precisely constitutes the 'North of England'" sentence, I just merged that with another paragraph slightly further down the intro and trimmed the redundant end of it) and as far as I can see I didn't add any "generally"s etc (the word "maybe" doesn't appear in the article at all, and "perhaps" only once). You're right that it certainly wasn't a full page clean-up – I only had a bit of time and mostly just wanted to update some outdated information and I also quickly shuffled around a couple of paragraphs that seemed jarringly long or short. If I have time I will go over it fully, but I didn't leave the article because I thought it was perfect and needed no additional edits. Smurrayinchester 08:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the reply.
 * The sentence was part of it and I do apologize - because, I rather followed a similar path of light edits, I really did not drill down too much when I visited the page - there were a few non-encyclopedic expressions, I did a few tweaks across the article -
 * I was born -- in Rochdale, my parents left many, many moons ago, hence the interest. I also took a run at Blackpool (that really upset a few folks) and English Language in the north, I suspect it is some nostalgic thing. Just in case you wondered as to why I might even be reading these things - these articles likely do not get a lot of traffic. My usual focus is on medicine/science articles.
 * Many thanks again, Cheers Doctor BeingObjetive MD. BeingObjective 16:45, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Nizza, Frankfurt
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Good job! Feel free to put your articles up at WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge! ♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I added it to Portal:Germany and established a category for the related images. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

British overseas cities on territories and dependencies
Hello User:Smurrayinchester, I recall you did some top work with some overseas historical details on the City status in the United Kingdom article couple years back, I am finally getting around after long-standing requests such as

Talk:List of cities in the United Kingdom Talk:City status in the United Kingdom

to spin those details out into a new article and would appreciate if you could sanity check it.

User:The Equalizer/Overseas cities

I'm still tweaking some sentences and am aware I could add some refs to the prose and update population counts, but any thoughts on aspects would be useful. I'll eventually mention on the above talk pages too (or might just go ahead once ready as several will see the linked updates on the main space articles) Regards, The Equalizer (talk) 14:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Also finding that as certain colonies received self government, the numbers of cities declared increased dramatically as the rules were not on the whim of a monarch and more defined on thresholds such as population and revenue which means a lot more to find, unsure whether I should restrict scope on the historical cities list for those and the dominions to either independence or responsible government being granted. Or just keep it as a list of key cities. The Equalizer (talk) 12:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Impressive work! And yeah, self-government is a bit of a grey area. I can definitely see the argument for cutting the list there. Otherwise it feels like every little village in Australia is a city! Smurrayinchester 13:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Cardiff Rift for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cardiff Rift is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cardiff Rift until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 14:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Winter wonderland
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Torchwood items for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Torchwood items is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Torchwood items until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

contacting admins listed as recently active
Could I request a look at the interventions of User:Maurnxiao in Talk:2024 United Kingdom general election, sections Infobox, Muslim Vote, and Workers Party.

A member of less than a week (although his very first post was challenging the status of sources as reliable, making me suspect he has been active under a different identity), entirely unaccepting of the principle of consensus, determined to see a level of coverage of one political party that is disproportionate to that given by mainstream news sources. Highly disruptive, unwilling to accept that his preference is not grounds to change the approach taken by the article. Time sensitive issue (election is in 10 days), so a quicker intervention would be desirable. Is seeking a topic ban suitable, or is some other solution more suitable.

With thanks. Kevin McE (talk) 08:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Obviously I feel an intense urge to defend myself after the way in which you have defaced my honor as an editor on here, but I should also really say that I had already acknowledged the lack of consensus and had stopped pushing for an inclusion of the Workers Party in the infobox with pictures should it be reintroduced. My question had been at what point does a regional party become significant enough in Westminster to be included. You had also promised to push for a "topic ban", whatever that is, if I should continue talking about Galloway in the talk page. I didn't make a single edit anywhere after that warning, and yet you chose to smear my name on so many different user talk pages? Maurnxiao (talk) 10:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you @Smurrayinchester, matter now seems closed. Kevin McE (talk) 11:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

WIkiProject Doctor Who Newsletter: July 2024
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)