User talk:Snackwell

A Cappella
First of all, welcome to Wikipedia. I agree with your contention that "ensemble" is overly formal -- what do you think of using the word "groups"? I also agree with what you said about a lot of those groups thinking of themselves as bands, rather than "ensembles," so I would suggest an expansion of the article to talk about modern a cappella. It might even make sense to talk about the change from more classical, formal groups to what I've largely heard referred to as vocal bands in its own article. I can probably crank out a paragraph and/or a stub for vocal bands, but if you're up to the task, you should definitely plug that info in. Again, welcome to Wiki! JDoorjam 15:06, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

BTW, you may simply want to write a short paragraph discussing the information already on contemporary a cappella. While this may make writing a vocal bands article moot, I still think the main a cappella page could use more information about the modern movement, as I suspect there are more "contemporary"-style groups today than there are classical (though that could just be my POV). JDoorjam 15:37, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fiksu


The article Fiksu has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Could you point out on article's talk the best coverage pieces for this company? Please note that mentions in passing do not count. We need in-depth, independent and reliable coverage. Thanks, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fiksu


The article Fiksu has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Not notable. Promotional tone, article obviously written by PR firm.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Citobun (talk) 14:31, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BuyerZone


The article BuyerZone has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * A highly promotional pages on an unremarkable private business. The article is sourced to online directories, passing mentions or otherwise unsuitable sources. Copy contains: "The BuyerZone editorial staff also provides objective Buyer's Guides and other articles that provide detailed purchasing information...." Significant RS coverage not found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:26, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of BuyerZone for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BuyerZone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/BuyerZone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Buyerzone logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Buyerzone logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 28 May 2017 (UTC)