User talk:Snailwalker/Archive2

Munster High School
I noticed that you correctly tagged this page as a copyright violation, but just wanted to give you two tips.


 * 1) If an article was created less than 48 hours ago and is entirely a copyright violation from a commercial content provider, i.e. no permission seems likely, you can skip the copyright process and instead tag the page for speedy deletion, using  . See WP:CSD for more.


 * 1) When you tag an article as a copyright violation, you should blank all the violating text from the page. This is so that content mirrors do not pick it up and spread the violation further.

Thanks for watching out for copyright violations! Stifle 23:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

CARTOONS OF MOHAMMED
Showing the figures of Mohammed is disturbing muslims. And it is a insult to Islam. In Islam making and also looking the figures of Mohammed is forbidden.That is raping the holy things of Islam.And it is not about "freedom".PLEASE get back your sıgnature.Thanks.--Erdemsenol 01:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes and it is illegal for Jehovas Witnesses to celebrate their birthday, does that mean I'm not allowed to celebrate my birthday? -- Snailwalker | talk 10:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Just out of interest, there's nothing in the Koran about not depicting Mohammed; this is another of those "essential" facts about Islam that rouse intense mob-feelings in many Muslims that's actually mot essential at all. There are important Muslim figures of the past who have depicted Mohammed.  I'd be interested to discover when the taboo became so deeply-seated. --Mel Etitis  ( Μελ Ετητης ) 22:37, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * This is a news item of major international interest and worldwide importance. Thank you for continuing to suggest it as a Candidate for inclusion in Current Events. Do I get the feeling that Wikipedia editors are now reluctant to include this story, for fear of upsetting some people? Bruce, aka Agendum | Talk 01:04, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

All islamic rules are determined by 3 sources.

First one is Koran itself.

Second one is the Sunnah that is how our prophet lived and what he said and adviced about islam. Sunnah is very reliable for us because our prophet lived how God ordered him to(Like other prophets)

Third one is "icma and kıyas". Icma and kiyas are applied when there is certainly not a clear definition about that matter in Koran and sunnah. Icma means that based on sunnah and koran, islamic scholars agree on something that is not specified in koran obviously. Kıyas is comparison. When there is a problem about something which is also not very obvious in kuran or sunnah, the origin and reason of the problem are found. Other similar problems which are caused by this reason and mentioned in Koran or sunnah are investigated and the decision about this matter is made by scholars.

Please note that icma and kiyas never produce something new but clarifies what is not easily noticable and it is done by scholars with great care.

In the light of above mentioned rules, I have some questions.

Are you a muslim? I am pretty sure u r not. So how can you come up with a nonsense idea about something you even dont have any idea about?

Have you ever read koran? I bet you probably heard it from someone else.

eating pork is strictly forbidden in Koran. It doesnt mention about a sausage or salami made of pork? Can anyone claim koran only forbids eating pork meat itself but it is nothing to do with salami.

Or what if a new animal is hybridized from pork and sheep by scientists(lets assume that it was succeeded). We will be pretty sure we muslims cannot eat it judging from icma and kıyas. Can you claim it is not mentioned in koran?

Who are those important islamic figures I dont know? Please give names. As a knowledgable person about islam, Why dont I know these islamic figures who broke such a basic rule?

Last but not least, Dont call islamic rules as taboos.

To the admins of wikipedia, I unterstand your reluctance about this discussion but this post I wrote is an informative post to preclude misunderstanding and misallegations about islam more than an argument. So please let it stay here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolverinex2 (talk • contribs)


 * Please sign your comments Wolverinex2 -- Snailwalker | talk 17:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Moving the image
You reverted my edit moving the image of the cartoons down, saying that the consensus was to keep the image. I did not delete the image, I just moved it "below the fold", so observant Muslims who might be offended by the image can choose not to see it, and others, who wish to see the image, can. Can you tell me why you insist on keeping the image at the top of the article? -- The Anome 13:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Removal of material from "Roma People" article
On my "talk" page, you wrote:


 * Hi ILike2BeAnonymous, I see you deleted the following sentence from the article about Roma People:


 * In Denmark there was a lot of debate because the muncipal of Helsingør had made a special Roma class at it's public schools, where all Romans were put. The classes were abandoned because it was found to be discriminating and the Romans were put in normal classes.


 * You argued that it was original research, but I don't see why you have that opinion. Could you perhaps enlighten me about your motivation for removing it?''

Actually, the "original research" sentence was the other sentence I removed, so that was my mistake. Yours was just plain badly written (and in non-idiomatic English), plus unsourced so far as I can tell. If you can find a reference for it, it can go back in, but will have to be re-written (it's obviously written by a non-native English speaker). --ILike2BeAnonymous 23:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Moving vanity to userspace:
Don't forget to mark the redirect page created by the move as a DB page. Hpuppet 22:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah I know, I just forgot it, but thanks for saying it anyways -- Snailwalker | talk 22:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Roller Coaster Infobox Feedback
It would be great to list the current amusement park and geographical location of the ride in the infobox. --G1076 16:32, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Amazing Luck w/Bot AWB
Hi!
 * Amazing luck you used AWB cleaning up Assiti Shards series now. I wanted to find someone category savvy to point out a system wide need, and you've got some software support to make the coincidence serendipitous! Would you be interested in fixing up a system wide mal-application of categories due to ignorance, and hence of massive errors of ommission? Please take a look at
 * CAT: Novel Sequences and CAT: Series of Books. By the definition of each, many works qualify for both, yet have only one, and more often, much of what is in the Series should be in the former.
 * A similar lack of knowledge of what should be a wider categorical membership, resulting in other systemic errors of ommission is present for the general categories involving membership in a milieu.
 * Thus, take a peek at the boiler plate list of project cats on Talk: 1632 series, and you should be able to see what I mean about 'universe' categories which are the ones I'm meaning.
 * I need to get back to my edit. But I accept email and will get back to you immediately if your examination of how the wider categories thereon are drasticly under populated from being under applied.
 * You may safely ignore the various project specific categories begining '1632-' as I spent a whole day with them. :( Sorry the list is in haphazard order, I've been very busy editing and expanding  this neglected project.
 * If I can do anything more, just Yell!

Fra nkB 22:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 05:28, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

AfD
Please follow the instructions at the bottom of WP:AfD for articles you want to AfD. --W(t) 21:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I had actually noticed it just before you left the message :-) -- Snailwalker | talk 21:26, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Mulletman500
I saw you welcomed the user above, but your turned into the full template, putting this user on the. I changed your tag into a tag. Please check your welcome to see that it doesn't happen again. Thanks. Jfing e  r s  88  01:58, 4 April 2006 (UTC)


 * It turns out it was User:ZsinjBot. Sorry. Jfing  e  r s  88  02:11, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It's okay, I just used the default template, so it should work :-) -- Snailwalker | talk 14:07, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Roller coasters WikiProject
When I stopped by Wikiproject/List of proposed projects recently, I noticed that you suggested a WikiProject for roller coasters a few weeks ago. There already is a WikiProject for roller coasters at WikiProject Roller Coasters. I wasn't sure if you knew about that one. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 23:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No I didn't know about that one, but thanks for telling me :-) Snailwalker | talk 09:58, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof
Hi, sorry you can't log in:neither can I. I've left AmiDaniel a message as VP suddenly quit just after I'd updated the user list, so I'm not sure whether all those who I added will have problems, or whether everyone is having problems, or just us 2! So I'll let you know when I have more news, although let me apologise if it's me who's caused htis problem (somehow) but I'm sure we'll get it sorted out very quickly. Let me know if you mangage to log in, or not, as the case may be. --Wisd e n17 22:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think you've messed anything up, it's probably just tempoary. So I should probably get to bed instead, it's 12:36 PM in Copenhagen :-) Snailwalker | talk 22:36, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

William Rufus Devane King
I don't know by what process a Danish high school student sets himself up as an expert on William Rufus King, but I assure you that the information I added to his article is all perfectly factual. I attended an afternoon-long lecture in the William Rufus King room at the Alabama State Historical Archive. These facts have also been referred to in various journals.

Incidentally, the room contains many beautiful pieces of porcelain he acquired during his time at the court of Louis Philip. Do drop by sometime; perhaps you may learn something about this great Alabamian, for whom I am named.

John King Carter Birmingham, Alabama johnkingcarter@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.175.139.50 (talk • contribs)


 * As far as I can see, then you haven't changed the article and added the information again. If it is correct, then why didn't you add it again? Besided I googled for information about him and couldn't find any places where it was mentioned! But if you find a source to back it up, then you should feel very welcome to add the information to the article and I'll gladly help you if it is needed! Best regards Snailwalker | talk 13:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:50, 24 April 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team

Re: Scientology controversy article
You recently added a cleanup tag to the Scientology controversy article. I would appreciate it if you would outline the reasons for this on the article's talk page. There are many editors willing to help fix the article and clean it up, and we are willing to discuss the issue on the talk page. But if we aren't provided with the specific reasons for you insertion of the tag it makes it almost impossible that we will be able to fix the article and remove your tag in a reasonable time frame. Also, in the future you should use the tag for any articles that need cleanup. The tag you used is not to be used anymore. Vivaldi (talk) 02:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I did argue for why I thought it needed the cleanup tag at the talk page, I wrote:


 * I think the intro needs to be cleaned up to follow the WP:MOS. I tried to wikify the first line so it looked like the template "This article is about....for other uses see...." What do you think? Snailwalker | talk 21:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The general problem with this article, is in my opinion, that it doesn't bold the name of the article which is required acording to WP:MOS. The quotes section is poorly formatted as well. I don't know why I didn't use the cleanup-tag tagged with the date, I usually do so. Have a nice day -- Snailwalker | talk 14:49, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Tennessee State Museum
Hi Snailwalker, are you claiming the $10 reward? Kaldari 05:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Please see my reply at your user page Snailwalker | talk 09:57, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Great, I have made a $10 contribution to the Foundation on your behalf:

Business Name: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. (The recipient of this payment is Verified) Total Amount: $10.00 USD Item Title: One time donation Comment: on behalf of Snailwalker for writing an article about the Tennessee State Museum Time: 09:18:56 PDT Status: Completed


 * Thanks a lot, I really hope the foundation is able to use the money. On another note, may I ask why you decided to give money to someone who was willing to write the article? Snailwalker | talk 20:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Copyrighted Material RE: Lombardi Software
I am not sure I understand. I work for Lombardi Software and we would like to put up a description of our company on Wikipedia. I see many companies who do it such as Business Objects (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Objects_%28company%29) or many others. What is the process for publishing our company information without you removing it?

Thanks

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tasumner (talk • contribs)


 * Well there is no problem with having an article about an company, as long as the company is notable enough. The reason I said the article should be deleted was because it was copied directly from your homepage, and as far as I could see that page was not released under the GLPL. You have to remember that everything you write on wikipedia is released under GLPL, which means that everyone can use the text and not only Wikipedia, and that you CAN'T claim copyright for it. You also have to remember that Wikipedia is written without point of view, i.e. you would probably not be able to copy a company profile directly as they tend to be very one-sided.


 * But if you can live with these requirements then there shouldn't be a problem with adding the article. Just send me an e-mail at snailwalker __AT__ hotmail __DOT__COM__ or write me here at the talk-page and I'll be happy to help you out!


 * Best regards Snailwalker | talk 22:49, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Please help on Mathematics
Posted by Pruneau 21:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team

Please help on Ancient Egypt
Posted by Pruneau 18:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team

Orphaned fair use image (Image:EK-32009.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:EK-32009.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hawaiian717 22:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Response
See my response at User talk:Treebark/Table. C a  rm  el  apple  22:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Danish report
You had signed up to write a Danish report at User:Treebark/Table. It's not due for another month but are you still doing it? Sugar pine t 15:49, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sorry I haven't started before but I've been really busy with a lot of stuff. But with the help from editors from the Danish wikipedia, it should soon be up and running :-) Snailwalker | talk 00:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It doesn't have to be ready for a little while... T®  e  e  bark   t  |  c  00:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Well I think it's better to do the work in good time! Snailwalker | talk 00:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree. T®  e  e  bark   t  |  c  14:02, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carbon nanotube
The article Carbon nanotube you nominated as a good article has failed, see Talk:Carbon nanotube for reason why the nomination failed. If or when this points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said artile. If you oppose this decission, you may ask for a review. → A z a  Toth 16:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Electron diffraction
Hello Snailwalker! I noticed that you recently rated Electron diffraction. I've done some work on this article, and if you have some input on how the article can be improved I'd really appreciate it! O. Prytz 14:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Portal:Physics Featured Article
Hello. I noticed that you've changed the format of the Featured Article section of Portal:Physics so that it points to a different page each week. While I have no major objections to having it set up like this, I'm a bit concerned that the section will be broken if no-one creates the page for a Featured Article for future weeks, especially bearing in mind how infrequently it's been updated over the last year or so. What are your thoughts on this? Mike Peel 12:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I can see your point, therefore I've added articles for the next three weeks. I hope people will help on updating the articles, it doesn't take very much work to add a new article... Snailwalker | talk 22:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Timeline of carbon nanotubes
Hello again. I've just gone through Timeline of carbon nanotubes (was History of carbon nanotubes) sorting out the formatting and references, and have flagged a number of facts that need references. As you created the original article, I was hoping that you be able to provide some of them? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well I didn't really create the original article, I've just done a lot of editing on it recently, but I'll look into it :) Snailwalker | talk 22:38, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Edit: my bad, I thought you were thinking of the Carbon nanotubes article Snailwalker | talk 22:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I've added some references, but couldn't find all of them. It should be said that I did not write the original article, I just copied it from the Carbon Nanotube article. Snailwalker | talk 23:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Roger D. Kornberg.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Roger D. Kornberg.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok   ☠  01:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC)