User talk:Snake0124

Welcome!
Hello, Snake0124, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 16:52, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Independence Day (1996 film) ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Independence_Day_%281996_film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Independence_Day_%281996_film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Alien and Implode
 * Swordfish (film) ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Swordfish_%28film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Swordfish_%28film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Clandestine
 * The Erlenmeyer Flask ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Erlenmeyer_Flask check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Erlenmeyer_Flask?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Clandestine
 * The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Lord_of_the_Rings:_The_Return_of_the_King check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Lord_of_the_Rings:_The_Return_of_the_King?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Mortal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Erlenmeyer Flask, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clandestine ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Erlenmeyer_Flask check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Erlenmeyer_Flask?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Die Another Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Icelandic ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Die_Another_Day check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Die_Another_Day?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited London Has Fallen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/London_Has_Fallen check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/London_Has_Fallen?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited U.S. Marshals (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SAD ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/U.S._Marshals_%28film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/U.S._Marshals_%28film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Peacemaker (1997 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosnian ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Peacemaker_%281997_film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Peacemaker_%281997_film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Your recent editing history at Iron Man (2008 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:19, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to GoldenEye‎, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Particulary, please review WP:FILMPLOT. DonQuixote (talk) 07:05, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at GoldenEye. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Particularly, plot summaries for feature films should be between 400 and 700 words.. DonQuixote (talk) 19:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at GoldenEye, you may be blocked from editing. Specifically, please keep track of the word count when editing the plot summary. Per WP:FILMPLOT, plot summaries for feature films should be between 400 and 700 words. DonQuixote (talk) 12:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

August 2020
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 13:40, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing.   Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 13:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia.   Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Barely Lethal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Your edits have repeatedly been deleted as WP:PLOTBLOAT, please do not do this again - Arjayay (talk) 09:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barely Lethal, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 09:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Barely Lethal; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 07:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia.   Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tomorrow Never Dies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sadism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Barely Lethal; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 21:49, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Disambiguation link notification for November 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Combat, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Foreign and Domestic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scream 4. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your edits have repeatedly been deleted as WP:PLOTBLOAT and have been warned previously numerous times of your disruptive editing. Please do not do this again.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Barely Lethal, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.40.18.61 (talk) 06:42, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Barely Lethal; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:32, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Shooter (2007 film); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 04:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Barely Lethal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 08:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Barely Lethal, you may be blocked from editing. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 01:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop interfering with other people's edits, editing and threatening to cancel other people's editing privileges when you've obviously never carried any power, authority or knowledge, to do so, is very annoying. I'm telling this to Binksternet and User:Wallyfromdilbert

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Barely Lethal. ''You are inserting information that is contradicted by the cited sources such as Metacritic. You need to stop.'' – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 04:48, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Jackal (1997 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Godzilla
Please stop interfering with other people's edits. And by the way, erasing other people's edits and threatening to cancel other people's editing privileges when you've obviously never carried any power, authority or knowledge, to do so, is very annoying.

Stop restoring these edits (1, 2, 3, 4). You are repeatedly adding content that is never referenced or specified in the film. This is disruptive. If you continue to restore these edits, you will be blocked. Armegon (talk) 03:04, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Armegon (talk) 03:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Jackal (1997 film), you may be blocked from editing. You are inserting unsourced content and are not even using edit summaries for any of your edits. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 22:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Siege, you may be blocked from editing. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Annabeth Gish, you may be blocked from editing. ''Why are you removing the article's lead picture? You are still not using any edit summaries to explain your changes.'' – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 23:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Annabeth Gish. Please stop removing the lead image of the article with no explanation. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 17:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Godzilla: King of the Monsters (2019 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please refrain from restoring "British Army former Colonel" in the plot summary. It is poor grammar and does not belong. If you have an issue, take it to the article's talk page. Armegon (talk) 06:10, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

September 2021
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Monica Witt does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! —  Fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124; 15:33, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elizabeth Marks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EOD.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You have already been told that IMDB is not an acceptable source. It seems from your editing history that you take no notice of warnings, so the next time you disrupt The Wraith or any other article on Wikipedia, your editing privileges will be blocked without further notice. Sweetpool50 (talk) 11:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * I've already spoken about this issue to one of your administrators and the administrator in question agrees to everything that they're watching me do regardless of any disagreements between me & other Wikipedia members. So unless your complainant is an administrator on Wikipedia, no other member is equipped with any power or authority to discipline or punish me. Snake0124 (talk) 13:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)