User talk:Snathan454

Your recent edit to Aspirin
Welcome. I have reverted your recent edit to Aspirin because the source article, in Arch Intern Med by Seshahi et al, is already referenced in the WP article. Furthermore, the paragraph you added also seems to ignore WP:DATED. If you have questions or concerns please feel free to discuss them on the talk page. -- UseTheCommandLine (talk) 16:34, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Reason to revert back again with changes
Dated reference can be corrected as "However, a 2012 study has found that despite important reductions in ...". The rest of it should be kept at the leading paragraph since the new research will require to be cited where the claim is being made. The new research buried way down will convey incorrect information unless someone reads the entire article. Alternatively the assumed benefits should also be removed from the leading paragraphs.