User talk:SneakyJen

November 2014
I undid your edit to Weaving. ‎
 * It was not a minor edit. See WP:MINOR.
 * Don't insert your own commentary in the article. If you wish to discuss problems in the article and the reasons for edits please put your comments on the talk page.
 * It appears to use a direct quote, but it was not properly punctuated and so it is impossible to tell exactly where the quote ends. See MOS:QUOTE and MOS:QWQ
 * The description of the author Ulrich was irrelevant to the article, promotional, and copied verbatim from the web. See WP:COPYVIO. Meters (talk) 20:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

in response to my suggested additions to the page of weaving being removed,

thanks? Meters. I am new to this adding info. part of Wikipedia.

I came at it with the best intent - to update the info. on loom weaving which is misleading in regards to only being done by men. I added a quote and sited it. I also qualified the quote giver as a Phd Harvard Professor and Pulitzer winner and therefore probably very well researched and reliable as a source. Backing up my short addition to your page.

I was hoping the valuable information I was sharing would be corrected to your format [which is not exactly first time user friendly btw] and added to the page. I require further instructions on how to add my corrections.

SneakyJen (talk) 21:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC) sneakyJen

I would be glad to remove my information - or has it already been done?


 * Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. Do you still have questions about why the material was removed? I'm not trying to stop you from adding to and improving the article, and that section does need some work. It looks like you have access to a good reference, you just need use it a bit differently. Maybe start with this link WP:PLAINANDSIMPLE. Please let me know if you have any questions. Meters (talk) 00:22, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:SneakyJen


A tag has been placed on User:SneakyJen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Meters (talk) 20:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)