User talk:SneaselxLv94

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SneaselxLv94/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  20:21, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mondotrack has been accepted
 Mondotrack, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Chris Troutman ( talk ) 09:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.
 * There are better sources out there. Please don't use PR releases, especially when you're writing about a company or commercial product that we might suspect is trying to advertise via Wikipedia. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 09:55, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Matt Boling) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Matt Boling.

User:Chris troutman while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Chris Troutman ( talk ) 16:06, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you Chris, I added citations for notability. Multiple articles from different sources are available. SneaselxLv94 16:18, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

UIL
I'm watching your sandbox. This issue is notability. If you attempt another list, not only will I nominate that for deletion, I might drag you to a drama board per WP:TEND. I'd be glad to discuss. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 16:26, 15 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I believe you are not well versed in Athletics, particularly Track and field. Some of the names on that list are of very notable athletes who represented the United States. Those are records that have been recorded and are referenced by multiple news outlets. As for the notability of the article, it speaks for itself. No other state compares to Texas and California when talking Track and field. See Which State Produced Most Olympians and Best State for HS Track Relative to Size and Best High School Track and Field Resides in California & Texas. There currently is no list like the one I produced. And as I have no affiliation with the UIL, I believe I should be the one to write said article.


 * Feel free to look at my sandbox. The ref's are not quite finished as I have a Latex Bib on my computer that hosts the correct form. As for the current article, I goofed and it was created. However, I intend to finish the correct version soon. You can waste your time looking, but I am confident I will have written an article of integrity in the end. An article that belongs on Wikipedia.
 * SneaselxLv94 02:06, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Be advised, the article has been deleted via discussion, so any re-creation can be speedily-deleted without discussion; it would be automatic. All your hours of work gone in just minutes, and you could be blocked, too. Your assertions about what you think are notable because you know something about sports show how clueless you are regarding Wikipedia. "As for the notability of the article, it speaks for itself." No it doesn't. I just proved that with the AfD. You may think that's crazy but nobody here cares about track and the editors who have rendered a decision don't have to know anything about track. "There currently is no list like the one I produced." Then go submit a manuscript to a running magazine or some such. Wikipedia is not a webhost. "I am confident I will have written an article of integrity in the end. An article that belongs on Wikipedia." Please do not run headlong into this or you'll just end up blocked. Leave your sandbox entry where it is and admire your work from there. Finally, that's not how pings work. Please change your site preferences to warn you of broken pings. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 15:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

WHO essential medicines
Hi SneaselxLv94. Regarding your removal of "the safest and most effective medicines needed in a health system" from multiple articles: I've been considering removing that material as well. However, it's related to a number of long-running disputes that have resulted in an Arbitration request that is now closed for community discussion (Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine). There are over 400 articles with the exact same content, and I'm not sure if it has ever been discussed. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 16:55, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your interest. I was not aware of the Arbitration about the topic. I came across the issue a month ago and posted about it on the list's talk page. It was one person who added the phrase to every medicine on the list. After no real objection on the Talk page, I decided to begin removing it. My problem is going through the list one by one. I have tried looking for a more "automatic process" but to no avail. Just knocking it out one medicine at a time, whenever I have the time. The phrase violates WP:CITESPAM. It should not be included every time the medicine is mentioned as being a part of the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines.SneaselxLv94 (talk) 17:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Glad you discussed it and the discussion went smoothly.
 * One of the areas already identified for discussion (Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine are better guidelines for what to include in the lead section of medical articles. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 20:29, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

"Expertly trained to deliver high quality care"
Hi, phrases like the above are far too promotional to be included in an encyclopedia, and would have qualified the article for speedy deletion as an advertisement. We just summarize what reliable independent sources say about subjects. Other than that, the cited sources in Airrosti appeared to be (at least partially) promo pieces that wouldn't clearly demonstrate notability. – Thjarkur (talk) 21:09, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Alright fix it then. Typing a message on my talk page aint gonna fix it.Sneasel talk 05:26, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Airrosti. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 10:56, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of ChrisFix for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ChrisFix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ChrisFix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. only (talk) 00:30, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Chelsea Rustad
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 03:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

The creator of Chelsea Rustad started an ANI discussion involving you and neglected to notify you, so I've done it instead. Also, just so you know, since they removed the WP:PROD notice from the article, it should be sent to WP:AFD instead of having the PROD re-added. clpo13(talk) 03:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Never mind, someone else took care of that: Articles for deletion/Chelsea Rustad. clpo13(talk) 03:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rick Winters


A tag has been placed on Rick Winters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://thebothsidenews.com/rick-charls-made-his-record-breaking-dive-in-1984-of-176-ft-at-sea-world-san-diego-by. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:07, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Felix Gretarsson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Felix Gretarsson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Felix Gretarsson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 10:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Grey Pneumatic Corporation moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Grey Pneumatic Corporation. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. voorts (talk/contributions) 04:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of UNiDAYS


The article UNiDAYS has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Seems non-notable; internet company stub."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 04:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Grey Pneumatic Corporation
Hello, SneaselxLv94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Grey Pneumatic Corporation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Grey Pneumatic Corporation


Hello, SneaselxLv94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Grey Pneumatic Corporation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)