User talk:Sneller1234

See this. It’s bad enough the person blocked me without warning and now they’re resorting to locking. I don’t understand why these people choose to act as if they own the Wikipedia website and they feel they can decide who can edit and who cannot. If you don’t like the fact we’re editing, that’s too bad. You need to start treating new editors like human beings and then you’ll have a better experience if you use common sense and assume good faith. Sneller1234 (talk) 10:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

there really is no such thing as “block evasion” — especially when you get blocked suddenly without warning. It’s like trying to stop somebody from using Google or Facebook in an attempt to coerce them from enjoying their benefits. Well, I have a right to enjoy a public Internet forum like Wikipedia and I won’t let others rob me of the chance to contribute. Sneller1234 (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You have no rights here. --Yamla (talk) 14:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.