User talk:SnittyT

Welcome!

Hello, SnittyT, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mitchell Snitty Theobald, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 03:25, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Mitchell Snitty Theobald


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Mitchell Snitty Theobald, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 03:25, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  06:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mini Hatch (2001–2006). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mini Hatch (2001–2006) was changed by SnittyT (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.900131 on 2011-07-11T06:34:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Common Nighthawk. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  07:03, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rawlings Gold Glove Award, you will be blocked from editing. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  07:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tbhotch


Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Nik the  stoned  07:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:25, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Looking over your contributions, to me it doesn't seem overly likely that what you've said is the case. Even if this is the case, which isn't really a valid reason anyways, edits like this don't really demonstrate a good understanding of Wikipedia policies. There are two possibilities here: 1) You made these edits yourself, for which the block for vandalism would stand or 2) Your account was compromised by another person, for which there's an issue on account security. Both possibilities here would render the same result, the unblock being declined. As I'm not a sysop it's not my call to make, but examining the edits it seems the former rather than the latter is the case in this situation. Steven Zhang The clock is ticking....  07:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)