User talk:Snowbite

October 2016
 Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to List of South Park episodes, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I am striking the above message because a subsequent edit was explained. Please continue to use edit summaries.


 * You may find the following pages have useful information about Wikipedia: Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Identifying reliable sources; Help:Footnotes; Verifiability; No original research; Neutral point of view; Notability; Biographies of living persons; What Wikipedia is not; and Words to watch. See also Help:Introduction to talk pages, Help:Using talk pages, Talk page guidelines, Copyright Problems Images and Uploading images. Help:Contents and Questions provide guidance and links to pages where help can be requested on various subjects. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Please repeat your edit summary with your new edits. The editor who has reverted your later additions may not have looked at prior explanations. Also, I have not checked this but I am assuming that the content exists elsewhere on Wikipedia as you stated. So that will support your revision of the article. If you are going to put it elsewhere and it does not yet exist, please do that before you make further deletions to the article to show that it is not now missing. Donner60 (talk) 03:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at List of South Park episodes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Your edits do not appear to be entirely constructive either.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 04:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 18:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring at List of South Park episodes
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report is at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:05, 23 October 2016 (UTC)