User talk:Snowfruit

Two articles you created, Killarney Historic Stages Rally and Killarney Rally of the Lakes, have been tagged with notability on top of them, because their importance for inclusion in Wikipedia is not clear. If you want to defend this situation, you are encouraged to do so on the articles' talk pages; however, you can try improving and sourcing the page content by editing either or both of them. In the meantime, you can help us by working on pages about more notable subjects. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! --Slgr @ ndson (page - messages - contribs) 17:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

I've added the "prod" template to the article Killarney Rally of the Lakes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Killarney Rally of the Lakes. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —WAvegetarian&bull;(talk) 22:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

I've added the "prod" template to the article Killarney Historic Stages Rally, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Killarney Historic Stages Rally. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —WAvegetarian&bull;(talk) 22:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)