User talk:Snowjukie44

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Monaco


A tag has been placed on Paul Monaco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 20:43, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

 * Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
 * I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD. Please follow the link in the CSD warning message above to see why the article was deleted. Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting.


 * For basic information on beginning to write an article see User:Dloh/new.
 * Sourcing is incredibly important for an encyclopedia. Be sure to list your sources at the bottom of the article.
 * For more general information about the deletion process, please see User:Dlohcierekim/deletion
 * If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.
 * Other helpful pages are--
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest


 * If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:/sandbox and consider using the Article Wizard.
 * Cheers, and happy editing. Dloh  cierekim  02:57, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Paul Monaco, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. GregJackP (talk) 20:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Paul Monaco. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 20:48, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Paul Monaco. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Lozeldafan (talk) 20:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Paul Monaco. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. GregJackP (talk) 21:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)