User talk:Snowolf/Archives/200804

Charming Associates
Hi Snowolf,

Before you deleted the Charming Associates page I added a 'hangon' to the page as I wish to contest the deletion. Were you not aware of this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Voncrass (talk • contribs) 09:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Please will you get back to me on this Snowolf as I would like to work with you to get this situation rectified as soon as possible. Thanks. Voncrass (talk) 10:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Snowolf, you clearly have not looked into the article before deleting it. The band have a commercial release available on CD and also available through the iTunes store. They are an important group in the documentation of UK hip-hop culture. Please can you look into this a little more before making your decition so quickly? Thank you. Voncrass (talk) 10:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Snowolf,

Reading the requirements, can I please refer you to this...

"Important note: Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is NOT a criterion for speedy deletion. However, an article that fails to assert that the subject of the article is important or significant can be speedily deleted under criterion A7. A mere claim of significance, even if contested, may avoid speedy deletion under A7, requiring a full proposed deletion or Article for Deletion process to determine if the article should be included in Wikipedia.

Many who spend significant time improving Wikipedia's musical coverage feel that notability is required for a musical topic (such as a band or musical theatre group) to deserve an encyclopedia article. Please note that the failure to meet any of these criteria does NOT mean an article must be deleted; conversely, meeting any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. These are merely rules of thumb used by some editors when deciding whether or not to keep an article that is on articles for deletion."

Reading throught that it seems to me that the page should not have had a speedy deletion. Under A7 my claim of significance should have avoided that. I believe you should have provided an Article for Deletion.

I genuinely believe that this band is of cultural significance. Will you please work with me to sort this out without hastey deletions?Voncrass (talk) 10:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I think the deletion history is part of the problem here, because it was deleted once I believe each other time I have tried to add it it has been deleted again without much consideration. Anyway, thankyou for restoring it to follow the proper procedure, It is most appreciated. Voncrass (talk) 11:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello Snowolf,

The Article appears to have been deleted yet again since you restored it. What is the reason for this? I was just getting around to citing things etc. Please help. 80.229.199.65 (talk) 13:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry. Which article are you talking about? (since articles can be created only by registered users, you must have forgotten to login ;-) )  Snowolf How can I help? 13:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

You're right, I was logged out and didn't notice :-) Thanks Voncrass (talk) 13:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, actually I see both the articles up :S  Snowolf How can I help? 13:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Battlemaster
I was editing a page titles battlemaster... Imagine my surprise just when i'm about to add sources, that some person who is trgger hapy with the delete button has ruined my work... Without giving me a chance to explain. I just created that page and forgot a few thing which i was adding, before you deleted it. Stop! Ceorl (talk) 11:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:05, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 05:54, 3 Apr 2008

Beyond Sanctorum
I find your message rather rude. I DID provide a edit summary, which is more than you did. I removed a section that was obviously POV. Furthermore, upon further reflection, the section I removed also was loaded with weasel words. I shall be restoring my edit, but I also know that mine is not the final word on the matter. I certainly welcome a discussion in this matter, provided that you are capable of behaving with respect towards other editors, which your instant and thoughtless revert makes dubious. 74.234.39.218 (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

John Bot Reversions
I don't particularly care, I'm just trying to figure out why. Kurt Weber ( Go Colts! ) 22:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks...I have articles for a couple of high school athletic conferences in Southern Indiana watched, so it just showed up and I was trying to figure out what the deal was...I don't really concern myself with articles getting tagged/untagged for projects I'm not a participant in; it just roused my curiosity a bit is all. Kurt Weber ( Go Colts! ) 23:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Here you go!

April GA Newsletter
The April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash (talk) 04:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Looks like you're almost done Much appreciated. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Hi, Snowolf. I've inserted template "IPsock" on several IP-addresses(,, , , , . There, user that used those IP-addresses signed himself as PIO, or had similar edit pattern, area of interest etc. Please take a look, and take necessary actions. I've posted this message also to admin Yamla, so you both can have notes.Kubura (talk) 07:32, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:EVE Online
Category:EVE Online, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Aexus (talk) 14:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 09:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Possible hack of your account
It appears that your account has been hacked, please see history of Template:Infobox McDonald's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerem43 (talk • contribs) 03:54, 27 Mar 2008

Veteran III!
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 06:05, 3 Apr 2008

I've nominated the EVE Online category for renaming
Hi, Snowolf. My name's Aexus. You are one of the editors of the EVE Online category. To comply with the trademarks guideline of the Wikipedia Manual of Style I have nominated the category to be renamed to its correctly spelled version of Eve Online. Actually the all-capitalized EVE is correct; however, it doesn't comply with the Manual of Style. In Wikipedia's terms it's therefore incorrect. I inform you of the nomination in case you disagree and want to discuss it. You can discuss it on the Categories for discussion page. Below is the according template.

VandalProof Backlog
Hi! If you're not to busy could you check out the VP registration page - theres like a two week backlog on the page. Thanks Fattyjwoods  ( Push my button  ) 05:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

WikipediaWeekly Episode 45
Hello again! Just a note that WikipediaWeekly Episode 45 has been released. Listen and comment at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/04/14/wikipedia-weekly-45-blps-revisited/. Cheers,  W ODU P  20:34, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you no longer wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from that list.

Dick Masterson
How come you deleted the article I recently posted for Dick Masterson? It described his significance as a chauvinistic web author. What was wrong?

Zeroshade66 (talk) 22:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episodes 46 and 47
Hey, Snowolf. I see that you are retired but may still edit, so I'm dropping off this notice. If you'd rather not receive these anymore, just remove yourself from the list or let me know and I'll do it. I'm sorry to see you go, but I understand you have a good reason.  W ODU P  03:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Just a quick note: Wikipedia Weekly Episodes 46 and 47 are out. A good listen as always. :) Cheers,  W ODU P  03:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)