User talk:Snowwhite5567/sandbox

Resources for Förster Resonance Energy Transfer page --Snowwhite5567 (talk) 01:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC) Snowwhite5567 (talk) 05:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Chen, Tongkai, et al. “Application of Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) Technique to Elucidate Intracellular and In Vivo Biofate of Nanomedicines.” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, Elsevier, 12 June 2019, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169409X1930064X.
 * Luling Wu, et al. “Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-Based Small-Molecule Sensors and Imaging Agents.” Chemical Society Reviews, Royal Society of Chemistry, 22 July 2020, pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2020/cs/c9cs00318e.
 * Xia, Zongping, and Yuechueng Liu. “Reliable and Global Measurement of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Using Fluorescence Microscopes.” Biophysical Journal, Cell Press, 6 Jan. 2009, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349501758869.
 * Sahoo, Harekrushna. “Förster Resonance Energy Transfer – A Spectroscopic Nanoruler: Principle and Applications.” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, vol. 12, no. 1, 8 May 2011, pp. 20–30., doi:10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2011.05.001.
 * Loura, Luís. “FRET in Membrane Biophysics: an Overview.” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 2, 15 Nov. 2011, doi:10.3389/fphys.2011.00082.
 * Sasmal, Dibyendu K., et al. “Single-Molecule Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer in Molecular Biology.” Nanoscale, vol. 8, no. 48, 16 Nov. 2016, pp. 19928–19944., doi:10.1039/c6nr06794h.

Looks like you have a good amount of resources to draw from. Good luck with the project! KC1200 (talk) 16:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

You have quite a collection of sources; I look forward to revisiting as your project proceeds! The Shabang (talk) 18:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Just checking in, and it looks like the article by Chen et al. will be a very useful example of FRET. And the article by Luis Loura seems a perfect fit for integrating biophysics into the FRET Wiki article. The Shabang (talk) 21:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

I like how you've distinguished your edits from the previous version by using italics. Also, I appreciate that you've included in-text citations to track who you summarized material from. You've built well on the biology section by going into detail into proteins for example, and are you going to also elaborate on chemistry / remove that section / not focus on it here? The Shabang (talk) 19:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Recommended to change "as spectroscopic ruler" to "as a..." in order to be more clear. The Shabang (talk) 23:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Also to change "study formation and properties" to "study the..." - again to be more clear.
 * I think each of the individual sections are very well-balanced, with none over- or under-emphasized compared to the others.
 * It also seems to have logical flow because you mentioned how it has both biological and biophysical as well as biochemical applications. Currently the intro includes two phrases ("in many biological and biophysical fields" and "in biology and biochemistry") that could possibly be combined into one list mentioning all three fields at once.
 * Splendid job linking important terms to their respective Wikipedia pages!
 * That is a great figure that truly enhances the page. Explanation of "FRET on" and "FRET off" may be helpful since those terms are not specifically mentioned in the article yet.
 * Great job overall! I'm really impressed by how you've improved on this Wikipedia article.