User talk:Snowysusan

Hello, I am re-visting a posting creation (The Crons Brand) that you had rejected last August with this comment. This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Yet some of the primary references for footnotes were from the NY Times, Pittsburgh Post Gazette, Wall Street Journal, CNBC and USAToday. Not sure why these references do not adquately evidence the subject's notability? Thank you for the clarification and specific suggestion to improve the posting. ComeReady (talk) 13:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Some helpful Pages:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style
 * Conflict of interest
 * Independent reliable sources
 * Referencing for beginners
 * Verifiability of source information
 * Notability criteria for companies
 * Policy regarding self promotional and advertising articles
 * What wikipedia is not

MESSAGES
Dear Snowysusan, An article about the humanitarian work I am doing recently appeared in the Miami Herald. I am trying to add it as a reference. I am not sure if I did this correctly. I also made some changes to the text and would love your feed back. Thank you, TinaTinacornely (talk) 04:30, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Articles for creation/TheQuizCenter
Dear Snowsusan,

Thanks for your editing,

You decline my first article related with my web site that is www.thequizcenter.com.

I just checked the wiki page of my competitors as like

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quizilla


 * The first reference was totally dead (http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2006/10/16/afx3093990.html)
 * The second reference is just a blog (http://xunker.livejournal.com/2002/08/04/)

Whereas my references are,


 * The Chrome Web Store App. of thequizcenter : That is one of 5 popular app of Chrome Web Store in Teacher&Admin Tools category with more than 21.000 downloads per week and, average 4,18 /5 points from 39 different user.

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/test-%26-improve-your-knowl/ilagnajmjdobfhidldegnpomkhinccdi


 * The second one is a user review from http://edupln.ning.com/ That is a ning site dedicated to the support of a Personal Learning Network for Educators, this review  is totaly indepented from me.

http://edupln.ning.com/main/sharing/share?id=4241570%253ABlogPost%253A188480 I think this references are enough for initial publication.

regards, akif sariibrahim akifsariibrahim@gnail.com

Bombs And Bottles
Hi, wondering if the Bombs And Bottles article I submitted is good to go? I'm new at creating articles on Wikipedia, so my apologies if I seem a little lose in this process. How can I get this article in and up there? Thanks  Michaelgr43 (talk) 16:26, 29 October 2012 (UTC)Michaelgr43

RazorThreat article submission
Snowysusan,

Thank you for reviewing the RazorThreat Article submission. Can you provide me with specific examples as to why the submission has been declined. It was modeled after several similar Articles. Thank you for your assistance. Frank Granite (talk) 01:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Neohumanism Submission
Hi Susan,

I don't know if you saw my previous message. It seems that you rejected my submission, because you think that an article already exists. Actually, it does not. The neohumanism of P R Sarkar has never been called "new humanism". And the link on Wikipedia for "neohumanism" goes to a single paragraph in a much larger article on P R Sarkar.

To clarify, the Neohumanism of P R Sarkar is a vast concept. There is no way to do it justice in a single paragraph. To amplify the subject within an article on P R Sarkar also makes no sense as it would disturb the flow of that article. Hence I propose to put a pointer under the paragraph on Neohumanism within the article on P R Sarkar to the "main article", where the subject may be more fully considered. This has already been done in the article on P R Sarkar in several instances (Ananda Marga, Social Cycle Theory, and PROUT). There are other pages on Wikipedia that relate to the works of P R Sarkar. For example, there is a page on Ananda Sutram.

P R Sarkar's philosophy of Neohumanism deserves a dedicated article and not just a single paragraph. Kindly guide me on how that may be accomplished.

--Abhidevananda (talk) 06:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Same subject... seeking clarification
Susan, you wrote: " As I indicated when I declined your article, if a paragraph is not enough, then add to it. Add your entire article to it you feel it is properly supported by reliable sources. There is nothing preventing you from doing that. There is no reason to delete the existing article or redirect readers to one rather than the other. Just combine your information with the information in the article that exists please."

I am still wondering if you have had a look at the article where the link to "Neohumanism" goes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prabhat_Ranjan_Sarkar. If you have, you would have noticed that there are already three [3] redirects in that article. The reason for those redirects seems obvious to me: the article is about Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar and, as such, it does not dwell on any of his main contributions. In this case I only want to amplify one of those main contributions. I do _not_ want to delete the existing article on Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar (or even the existing paragraph on Neohumanism). The article on Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar is okay. The single paragraph on Neohumanism within that article is also okay (in that context). But the subject of Neohumanism badly needs amplification. And so I would create an additional, dedicated article on the subject. To my thinking, that seems quite reasonable. To add to the article on Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar all of the material on Neohumanism that deserves mention would severely disrupt the flow of that article. So I don't understand what is the objection to my creating a dedicated article on Neohumanism. In which way would this violate the purpose or nature of Wikipedia or disturb any existing reader or contributor?

Please pardon me for nagging, but your rejection of my article - for reasons that make no sense to me - leaves me little alternative. I tried to get answers on the "live chat", waiting for well over one hour without receiving a single response. I would greatly appreciate it if you could clarify this matter for me.

--Abhidevananda (talk) 08:56, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Snowysusan, Thanks for your advice on how to make an infobox. I copy pasted the lines for a scientist infobox by highlighting the contents. Then I filled in the relevant details. Pressed save but no voila! What am I doing wrong? Please help. Perhaps I don't know the way to copy-paste the template. Thanks for your help. Best wishes, Rkulka 132.64.35.131 (talk) 14:50, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

talk page created for me
Hello, just saw notification that you have created my "talk page" and sent me a message there. Thanks for that. I've never edited/created an article before, though I think I corrected a vandalism I happened upon some time in the distant past. I've drafted a very short initial article about the Korean dance team Waveya, motivated by the fact that I was surprised that one didn't exist given their notariety. Since I don't speak/read Korean it's been a bit challenging to dig up more actual facts on them, I'll probably try to use google translate if it seems viable but really I'm hoping that the (stub?) page I've created will actually attract people who do speak/read Korean natively that could assist in fleshing out the page. I guess I'll find out. In any case it'll be a worthwhile exercise for me, I don't know what I or indeed the world would do without Wikipedia so if there's anything I can add to the body of knowledge, trivial though it may be, I'm keen to do it. This seems like a good jumping off (in?!) place. Kpopfan1a (talk) 02:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Wavey Article
Hello Snowysusan, thanks for your edits, constructive criticism, etc. I shall indeed research as you suggest to discover some more facts. Maybe after I've found a bit more you could take another look. --Kpopfan1a (talk) 12:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Francisco mora catlett Bio; reference additions
10/31/12

Dear susan, as per your instructions. I added as many references as I could find on the Mora Catlett Bio.. Please let me know if these will suffice...

Thank you,

Steve Bryant — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbryant415 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Snowysusan, Thanks very much for creating the info box which is very helpful. There is only one bug: birth and death dates are preceded by "template". How can I delete this?

I am now ready to insert the photo. I thought I succeeded in uploading it to Wickimedia commons as "Norman Edson.jpg" but could not find it. The photo is original from my collection so there are no copyright problems and access should be free. I got to the point when the programme asked me if to keep the resolution, I agreed, it showed the photo, then dead end. I thought it had been saved. Would appreciate help. Best wishes, Rkulka Rkulka (talk) 20:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Snowysusan,Thanks very much for creating the info box which is very helpful. There is only one bug: birth and death dates are preceded by "template". How can I delete this? I am now ready to insert the photo. I thought I succeeded in uploading it to Wickimedia commons as "Norman Edson.jpg" but could not find it. The photo is original from my collection so there are no copyright problems and access should be free. I got to the point when the programme asked me if to keep the resolution, I agreed, it showed the photo, then dead end. I thought it had been saved. Would appreciate help.Best wishes,Rkulka Rkulka (talk) 20:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Neohumanism
You might be interested in User_talk:MrNiceGuy1113. I didn't really read the article - a touch of WP:TLDR - just handled the navigation issues. I don't know whether the article is still close to the version you rejected at AfC. Pam D  08:00, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

"shortology" article
Thank you for your kind answer about the "Shortology" article. Maybe we chose the wrong definition, describing it as a new way to synthesize things. Shortology is actually a book, so would it be possible to create an article describing it as a book, i.e. a literary work? We've seen that books, movies and other literary or artistic works have their own articles on wikipedia.

thank you so much.

H-57 Creative Station — Preceding unsigned comment added by H-57 (talk • contribs) 10:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Review Feedback
Hello Snowysusa,

I am a new Wiki member and I recently tried to create this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Cupid_Media which you reviewed. Kindly let me know what I need to do so that my submission can be accepted.

Thank you

Stella. Stellamwangi (talk) 13:18, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

hi Snowysusan thank you for your advise on bullying — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bratanna95 (talk • contribs) 14:40, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Dear Susan--modified Damelin article: 6 November
Dear Susan, Thanks so much for your latest comments re the Steven Damelin article. I really appreciate them very much. Ive gone through each footnote now and the comments re each are below for you. 1. Lubinsky webpage with link to graduate stuidents, Steven Damelin is listed as Phd student. 2. Lubinskys Geneology--Damelin is listed as Phd student. 3. IMA, past New Directions Professors, Damelin is listed as one. 4. A document entitled verification.docx. In this document, I have listed 4 emails from the 4 people who have verified my positions. (a) Michael Sears from Wits University, Former Dean and Dept Chair. (b) Mary Boyd from Penn State University, Mathematics department, assistant to the Chair. (c) Sharon Taylor, Chair of Math, Georgia Southern, (d) Marcus McWaters, Chair Math Dept, USF. (e) Footnote (3) verifies my position at the IMA at the University of the Minnesota. 5. Students, Geneology link as Lubinskys Geneology link in 2. 6. Students, cv link. 7. Wayne Country Day school webpage of mine as a faculty member there. 8. Wayne Country Day school upper school teachers webpage with me listed as faculty member there. 9. My publications. Each has a link to the paper and where it has been published or submitted for publication. 10. Google scholar with my papers which verifies papers in my publicationlist as well. 11-12. Links to my book with Willard Miller as proof through Cambridge Press. 13-14. Links proving the committees on the american math society. 15, 16: GSU newsletters which document the awards listed. 17. Wits newsletter which documents the awards listed.

Question: Can you also help me put a link at the end of the article to my homepage: http://www.waynecountryday.com/~damelin. Im not sure how to do it.

Also, I wasnt sure how to upload the verification.docx as a document so provided simply a link to it via my public-html file but if you would rather like it as a uploaded document and you can help me do it--by all means--no problem.

I am hopeful that this now deals with all your concerns and this can be accepted and appear soon. I look forward to hearing from you real soon. Thanks so much susan.

Best regards, Steven.

Stevenbdamelin (talk) 01:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Dear Susan--modified Damelin article: thanks for your help Susan
Dear Susan, thanks for your help with this. I just emailed you the latest revision and all the details you need regarding independent and verifiable sources. Im sorry its taken a bit long to get back to you but I needed people from all places Ivee worked to email verifications. I hope now this will be accepted real soon and look forward to hearing from you. best regards, steven. 01:54, 7 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenbdamelin (talk • contribs)

Dear Susan--the Damelin article has been completely rewritten and is much much shorter--would you be willing to look at it again?
Dear Susan--the Damelin article has been completely rewritten and is much much shorter--would you be willing to look at it again? Im sorry I did not understand you. For example, if you look at other colleagues of mine, say Douglas Arnold at UMN he gives zero evidence at all for any of the posts he has occupied. Similarly many others, Percy Deift, George Andrews. All the same--the article now is is much much shorter. I have removed all the places where I have worked even though they are totaly true and only listed the bare minimum of things where each one can be easily verified. Id very much appreciate your help in seeing if we can get this accepted. Best, Steve. Stevenbdamelin (talk) 14:45, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Francisco mora catlett Bio; reference additions
11/8/12

Dear Susan,

I'm still waiting for an answer on the Francisco Mora Catlett bio references.... Could you please reply?

Steve Bryant

A little more help needed
Hi Susan - you kindly edited my submission a few weeks ago. Another editor has helped me a but but I am just stuck with something I think you can solve quite easily for me.

This is the submission link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Johnalex001

There are 2 things actually. 1. I cannot get citations for some of the awards as they have been taken off the web. Is this ok? 2. I seem to have got a little muddled with the citations and references. Specifically for reference 5 - the john logie baird award. I cannot code it correctly into the reference for some reason.

Hope you can help. Thanks again. John Johnalex001 (talk) 15:13, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Roland St John
Snowysusan, Thanks for your assistance on my Bernard Hesling article. Could you or a colleague pls have a look at my article on Roland St John and Wikipedia's reservations at the top of the article. There's not much more I can add to it. Roland's son David and daugher Philippa are happy with the article. --Mincht (talk) 11:36, 9 November 2012 (UTC) Snowysusan, Thanks for your advice. I have made changes - converted text to quotes, put in more cites, etc. When convenient could you or a colleague please have a look at the article now. --Mincht (talk) 03:25, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Snowysusan, I was editing the Otto Niemeyer article, adding bits about his visit to Australia, when suddenly someone added in the first line that he was a Nazi. That is incorrect: he was UK director of the Bank for International Settlements 1937-1940, when the Bank was facilitating finance for Nazi Germany. Not a good record, but he wasn't a Nazi. What's to be done with such edits?--Mincht (talk) 04:26, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Snowysusan, Can you pls help. I tried to add a photo of my uncle Roland St John to my Wikipedia article on him, but the photo is distorted! What went wrong? How do I fix? --Mincht (talk) 03:27, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Walkodile
Susan - sincere thanks for helping me again. You and your colleagues have been so supportive. Thank you again very sincerely. I will follow up your suggestions.Best regards. John. Johnalex001 (talk) 15:34, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Budd Albright
Hi Susan, You helped me a month ago with a page for Budd Albright. Last week someone challenged the photo and then deleted it from the page. Any idea how/why? I'd like to put the picture back up, if I can. Any help is greatly appreciated! thanks so much, Allie Fairchildallie (talk) 18:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC)fairchildallie

The picture is from his own personal website and he sent me a copy to post on his wikipedia page. I have full permission to use it in this manner. Do I need something from Budd to prove this? Also, you helped me the first time around to post the photo, so I'm not sure how to go about re-posting. thanks again, and I hope the "real world" is treating you well! Fairchildallie (talk) 23:10, 13 November 2012 (UTC)fairchildallie

Hi again, Response from Budd:  the picture in question was taken by a friend (non professional) at a water ski race at Lake Arrowhead in 1970 - and I have owned it ever since. the person that took that photo has since died...

Not sure what else we need? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fairchildallie (talk • contribs) 17:18, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for useful links.

Wizzy003 (talk) 19:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Review of a page
Dear Snowysusan,

I am new to wikipedia and I was wondering if you would review a page that I have contributed on: reza safa.

I am not really sure if I am using this New Section of your user usertalk correctly, but this would be a great help to me!

Thank you!

JimShaefer12345 (talk) 01:15, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

A minor matter where I had noticed your efforts to assist
Greetings Snowysusan!

I noticed that you had worked to improve upon an which was recently submitted and rejected. That article was subsequently re-submitted, and I reviewed it. I left these suggestions (re his Banking Sector Competition AfC) for the author/ user, which are quite detailed. I wanted to inform you of this, so you would be aware that he IS receiving attention and guidance for what appears to be a series of recent, recurring issues pertaining to related subject matter, and that as a new user, he is not being neglected.

I hope all is well with you. My Wikipedia experience is always brightened a bit whenever I see your distinctive moniker. Even if you are not the white haired grandmother that I never had, you do conjure images of an archetypal elderly relative-cum-kindly librarian, well-meaning and wise. Your actions are in accord with this, so I never feel manipulated nor deceived. I certainly don't feel that familiar stomach sinking sense of dread and dismay as when I see a certain unpleasant editor's footprint on article histories! But to be honest, I haven't seen that in a very long time, so the stomach sinking and lurching is no longer familiar at all. Best wishes for the Diwali, Thanksgiving, Hannukah, Yule-tide and overall Saturnalia season to you and your family! --FeralOink (talk) 15:26, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Submission of Frascati DOCG and Frascati Cannellino
Hi Snowysusan,

thank you very much for your comments on two subjects which were rejected, Frascati DOCG and Frascati Cannellino

Let me say that, in good faith, I am trying to contribute to two subjects on the Frascati Wine which deserve better information. I was born in Frascati and live there, and my father and gradfather have been involved with wine since ever. I have no interest in wine, as I am an IT engineer, but I would like to contribute before I die.

Now to the points. Frascati DOC article exist in wikipedia, but this is old information, DOC has been superseded by DOCG, that's why I wanted to start a new article and improve it.

Frascati cannellino as well, is a jewel wine from Frascati little known, but famous since the ancient roman and the pope times, and that very few people know. As a matter of fact a Frascati Cannellino article exist in the Italian section of wikipedia. I wanted to make it in English and also adding some information which is missing from the italian article, since I know how was really done!

Let me add that from a writer perspective, it is frustating to see rejections when you are in good faith, especially when you see contributions from people who may not have sufficient in depth knowledge about the argument.

If you have time, please tell me if I have to contribute further or give up, in any case, many thanks

--Mamilius (talk) 07:59, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

SPARC and Breastfeeding in Pakistan
I received a message that the above submission is not acceptable. Is my understanding correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AJillani (talk • contribs) 12:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC) Hi Snowysusan: Can you please tell me as to which portions require verification? AJillani (talk) 13:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC) Hi Snowysusan: You say that the article SPARC and Child Rights Society in Pakistan will also be rejected due to lack of verification. It remains unclear as to what kind of verification is required as almost all the information relates to the Society's history.AJillani (talk) 13:36, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Dear Snowysusan: I have resubmitted article SPARC and Breastfeeding with a few citations. Can you pls tell me if I am on the right track?AJillani (talk) 13:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC) Subject of my article''' is... −	The issue bottle feeding caused by the marketing of infant formulas acted as a catalyst for SPARC’s establishment (SPARC was registered on December 17, 1992, in Islamabad, Pakistan, as Society for the Protection of the Rights of the Child). −		 −	IBFAN (International Baby Food Action Network), a worldwide coalition of citizen groups working for adopt and enforcement of legislations to give effect to the principles and aims of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes (“the International Code”), made SPARC a member and helped it in opposing the marketing of breastmilk substitutes. −		 −	In December 1985, one of SPARC's founding member, Mr Anees Jillani conducted a study for UNICEF concerning the implementation of the International Code. In February 1992, Mr Jillani was sent by UNICEF to attend an IBFAN Training Course on Implementing the International Code in Malaysia. From September 23 to October 3, 1992, IBFAN asked him to attend as a resource person its Training Course on Implementing the International Code in Antigua, Guatemala and then its Regional Training cum Workshop at Dhulikhel, Nepal, from January 27 to February 4, 1995. From September 6 to 8, 1983, he was invited by the WHO to attend an Informal Consultants Briefing on the International Code in Geneva, Switzerland. −		 −	In the midst of all these developments, Mr Jillani was asked by Unicef to draft a national legislation for implementation of the International Code which, which after undergoing several modifications and stiff resistance from the infant formula industry, eventually led to the enactment of the Protection of Breastfeeding and Young Child Nutrition Ordinance in October 1992. Subsequently, Unicef asked Mr Jillani to draft the Rules under the Ordinance which eventually were notified to come into force in February 2010.

Hi snowysusan
thank you for your nice welcome! Memphisflash56 (talk) 10:05, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Frascati Cannellino
Hi Snowysusan, thank you very much!

I really appreciate you taking your time to guide me through the submission process, these are my first contributions and I admit, I am a novice.

I have expanded it a bit and as you suggests, added several references, which are all independent. Just as a curiosity, you mention that the Italian Frascati Cannellino has 14 sources, but if you look carefully, they only the first two are real ones, the other 12 are references to a web site of food which they say can be coupled with Cannellino (and I doubt it), and has nothing to do with wine itself.

You are mentioning that the reader has to verify what is written, if you need any evidence that I have taken it from the sources, I can send you the reference and the material itself.

Thank you for supporting, if the article has reached a decent level, I will continue to improve it further and also resubmit the other pending article on Frascati DOCG.

Many thanks again

Mamilius (talk) 19:21, 18 November 2012 (UTC) --- Hi Snowysusan, regarding the Frascati Cannellino submission, I sent you the above remarks after making changes, but havent heard from you since a week. When you have time, please have a revision, your comments are welcome!

Mamilius (talk) 08:12, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

reply to your feedback
Hi Snowysusan, first of all thank you for your welcome. And thanks for reviewing my article. As I'm new to Wikipedia and this is my first attempt of writing an article here I would be pleased to get some help from you. Could you please tell me what exactly I need to edit in my article. I've added references but I'm confused now (sorry) what else I must add/change so that you accept my article.

[] []

--Viv1112 (talk) 19:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

messages
Hi Susi,

I submitted an article for review a few days ago and now get messages in my email that mean nothing to me. Stuff about joining Teahouse; last one was from you:

The Wikipedia page "User talk:Lauriebak" has been changed on 18 November 2012 by Snowysusan, with the edit summary: /* Welcome! */ new section

etc.

I really don't know what to do with these messages and I don't know the status of my article. I'm really not interested in editing or chatting at this time ... just want to get this article accepted.

Can you explain the process?

thanks LaurieLauriebak (talk) 20:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Dear Snowysusan,

Thank you for your welcome and the pointers. Wikipedia is still a bit like a foreign language and will take me a little while to absorb all the info you have sent me. I will keep trying to improve my page on Penpont Brewery and hopefully learn as I go. Someone or some programme has managed to sort my references into the proper format and I am sincerely thankful for that!

Regards

Bobkat12--Bobkat12 (talk) 10:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Articles for creation/Total mortgage services
Snowysusan, thank you for reviewing the article I recently put up for creation. The reason that you rejected the article is that it apparently read more like an ad to you than an encyclopedia entry. I am wondering what kind of information you would suggest adding to make it more appropriate.

Our references, I believe, are varied and independent. What sources would you prefer.

Thanks again,

--Zachrichardcb (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

New 'SoccerStarz' page that was declined because of referencing issues.
Hi Snowysusan

Please see my new updated page regarding 'SoccerStarz'. I have put in as many references as I can find at this time. As the brand is a fairly new product, there is not that many articles on the subject at the moment, however over time and with other contributors help I'm sure we can build this page up to be a very reliable and verifiable source of information. If there are any other specifics that require references, would you be kind enough to point them out to me.

Many Thanks

--BerbatovsFirstTouch (talk) 18:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Decline due to non "notability"
I understand and accept the reasoning behind declining the proposed Wikipedia article for "Rachael Kelsey Smith," a prominent feline activist and up and coming graphic design artist. However, I find Wikipedia definition of "notable" both loose and contradictory. For example, there is a very large page devoted solely to Kim Kardashian. Really? As a member of America for over 23 years, I fail to see how Kim Kardashian has contributed to society at all; and the fact that her page credits her as a "style icon" leads me to question the editing staff of Wikipedia as an entirety. Shame! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.193.52 (talk) 01:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Distance education in europe
Hi Snowysusan,

Thanks a lot for you feedback in relation to my article. You clearly pointed out that the article was turned down because it included copyrighted information. I would like to make improvements and amend this issue. I would highly appreciate it if you could point out which section within the text specifically has this copyrighted info? Following your response, I will continue to work on improving the submission.Thank you very Kindly.

Best Regards,

Studyinformant007Studyinformant007 (talk) 11:51, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Robbie Steinhouse
Dear Susan

I am resubmitting the article about Robbie Steinhouse that you declined on 21 Sept.

I have beefed up the paragraphs on the content of the books, and added some references.

I think that this author should be on Wikipedia because he has had three books published by a reputable publisher (Prentice Hall are part of Pearson).

Best wishes FabFred Fabfred (talk) 12:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/LCT Lawyers
Dear Susan,

Thank you for your editing.

I understand your concerns that the article may read like an advertisement. However, the page only uses information that are in the public domain without any undesirable puffery.

I refer to the following approved law firm articles with similar content as the one that I created:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davies_Ward_Phillips_%26_Vineberg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cains_%28law_firm%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fenwick_%26_West

Otherwise, I would be very grateful if you could let me know which particular sections I will need to change. I will make amendments accordingly and resubmit.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Logan.leung (talk • contribs) 11:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Please clarify Notability
Good Day Snowysusan, please clarify how we need to prove notability for the page Nampak Limited. As mentioned the company is indeed one of the biggest companies in Africa and very notable. I did not include all the ref links as it would seem very spammy to add well over 500 links mentioning Nampak as a major company in Africa (thought the Bloomburg link would be enough). Please advise me of the best way to incorporate these links and I will do just that. The company is listed on List of companies traded on the JSE and many much smaller, less notable companies are listed. Any help from you to get this listing live would be appreciated.

I have many news stories showing the credibility of Nampak Nampak News By reditable Third Party News Source In SA

--Bryancasson (talk) 12:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Hybrid Law submission
Hi Susan,

as I am (very) new at this I quite don't understand if my article is good to go or not. Is there anything else I should do, as I already re edited it after being rejected once? Thank you, Anne — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnneWilmont (talk • contribs) 13:31, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Focal Point page updated to include further references for notability
Hi,

I have updated the Focal Point page to include further references for notability. It is not a new tool; it has been around over 10 years and has tens of thousands of users. The references I added were a link to an independent survey on LinkedIn that rated it highest amongst Product Management tools, a link to the most recent Gartner EA Magic Quadrant within which Focal Point and System Architect are listed in the Leaders quadrant -- in fact they are highest in "ability to execute" but Gartner does not allow any vendor to say a tool finished highest; you can only say are listed as Leaders. I also added a link to an integration with Computer Associates Planview, which is one of the most widely used project management tools in the industry. There is a page on IBM that lists customer stories but I don't know if this should be on the wikipedia page -- published by IBM but shows how many big companies are using this product successfully http://www-01.ibm.com/software/success/cssdb.nsf/softwareL2VW?OpenView&Count=10&RestrictToCategory=default_RationalFocalPoint&cty=en_us

Let me know if there is anything else that you need for this article to be published. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louv (talk • contribs) 16:44, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your review of and my amendments to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/LCT Lawyers
Dear Susan,

Thank you for your feedback. I have taken on board your comments and have made substantial edits to the article. I would be very grateful if you could let me know whether it meets your criteria and if not, what changes will need to be made.

Thank you for your time. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Logan.leung (talk • contribs) 05:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Ateronon
Hi, Please could you confirm my Ateronon submission is now ok? Thanks meeahlo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meeahlo (talk • contribs) 16:09, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Re: Howard M. Guthmann article
SusanGuthmannHenry (talk) 20:08, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Hi, Snowysusan!

Thank you for being kind to a brand new contributor and looking at my article!

I think I've fixed it so that it is no longer blank but I am not sure.

Could you look and see if it's okay now?

Thanks so much! SusanGuthmannHenry (talk) 20:08, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello Snowysusan, I am having trouble finding secondary sources because I am writing about a company from the 80s before the internet was widely available. However, I have hard copy newspaper articles from news publications now debunk. How can I incorporate them into the article if they cannot be seen or verified by people online? Thank you ahead of time! Sincerely, Ashleyisfree.Ashleyisfree (talk) 23:09, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Crystal Spectacles
Snowysusan: Thank you for reviewing my submission so quickly. Can you explain what would be considered cite verifiable? I shared that the song Epistle To Dippy by Donovan refers to the Crystal Spectacles and that they are shown in the movie Imagine, about John Lennon. If I said how many minutes into the movie they are shown, would that make it verifiably cited? If not can you give me an example as to how something like that would be properly cited? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicholas Duva (talk • contribs) 13:55, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Ateronon
Hi, Thanks very much - think I've got that now! MeeahloMeeahlo (talk) 14:13, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Shane Stay
Novemberflower (talk) 04:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC) Hello Snowysusan,

I have edited the Shane Stay page and I have completed the references. How do I resubmit for review?

Thank you Novemberflower

Shane Stay
Novemberflower (talk) 04:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC) Hello Snowysusan,

I have edited the Shane Stay page and I have completed the references. How do I resubmit for review?

Thank you Novemberflower

Comments for Leatt-Brace entry
Thank you for your recommendations for the Leatt-Brace entry! I've made your suggested changes and am resubmitting now. Raven2277 (talk) 15:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

New Article - Institute for Statistics Education
Hi - I'm writing about the article you declined on the 24th (concerning the Institute for Statistics Education). I think it meets all the criteria that you mention, except that the two sources (#1 and #3) that establish notability and independence are apparently not available online. Would it help if I sent those to you? Peter Bruce (Petercbruce) Petercbruce (talk) 17:42, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Revised article: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/LCT Lawyers
Dear Susan,

Thank you for very much for your feedback last week.

I haven't heard back from you yet after my follow-up email, but I have made further substantial edits to my article following your comments.

May I ask whether the article now meets your criteria and follows that of other similar articles? If so, may I ask what the process is now? Do you reverse the declined status? Or do I create a new article and start from scratch?

Otherwise, I would be grateful if you could inform me what further changes need to be made.

Logan.leung (talk) 02:23, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Neptune Society Review
Hi SnowySusan,

Thank you for your feedback regarding my submission of the Neptune Society. You commented that the submission did not read neutral, but rather as a sales pitch. Can you please provide an example. My submission covers 4 distinct companies, and I made an effort to state only facts without showing preference to any one company.

Your feedback also stated that footnotes should related only to external sources. In this case, the references were from Business Week and the Houston Chronicle, not from company releases. So, what would you recommend?

Thanks, 107.192.218.226 (talk) 03:51, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Sabadell United Bank Wiki page
Hello Snowysusan,

I think my article was declined again for references after I put serveral in. I referenced everything I used to write the article, can you explain to me what the issue(s) are?

Best, Mark — Preceding unsigned comment added by MJaundoo1 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Clean-up templates at AfC
Hi Snowysusan, I notice you're adding clean-up templates to draft articles at AfC. I'm not sure this is a good idea, because these are not articles yet, therefore have plenty of opportunity for improvement before they're moved to article space (if ever). Clean-up templates will add these drafts to someone's work list too! It will be far better (you've been doing this anyway) to add a brief word of advice in the form of an afc comment. Hope that makes sense. All the best! Sionk (talk) 10:32, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Murshidabad College of Engineering and Technology Article re-review requested
Dear SnowySusan

I have made quite a few changes to the article on Murshidabad College of Engineering and Technology, after you rejected my submission mentioning the reason as "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia". I have tried to maintain neutrality.

Request you to kindly have a look when you can and let me know.

Thanks a lot for your help.

Regards, --Chiranjibmazumdar1 (talk) 16:54, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Articles for creation needs YOUR help!
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:29, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.

Poos Collection
Snowysusan,

I appreciate your help getting the Poos Collection article formatted correctly. I still have much to learn about the Wiki system. So, does this mean it can now be added to the encyclopedia? If so, how do I do that/

Thanks for the editing on the Poos Collection! Lori Lori Triplett (talk) 15:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

IBM Rational Focal Point Feedback
Hi Snowysusan, Still awaiting feedback from you for the Focal Point page which I've added additional industry sources of information for notability, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/IBM_Rational_Focal_Point — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louv (talk • contribs) 17:33, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Catiana Vitanza
I noticed you declined this for being a non-notable athlete. For the future, the article said they played for FCF Como which would make them notable. Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 23:31, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Justin P. Wayoro
Hello. You are one of four editors who inspected/declined Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Justin P. Wayoro for reasons other than blatant copyvio. This article was merely a bunch of text cobbled together from various sites. Step one in reviewing an article for creation should be to dump a string into google to see if it is a copyvio. If it is, the text should be immediately removed and an inspection of any images should be undertaken. In this case, the style of writing should have set of all sorts of copyvio alarm bells in your mind. Cheers, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:17, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

== Creation of Wikipage  for  Teodoras Daukantas ( Lithuanian Cabinet Defense Minister, 1925-1927 ) Member of European League of Nations : 1932 Treaty signator with Carlos Saveedra Lamas  Treaty # 3542  ==

Sue;

I am Jorge Vytautas Daukantas, nephew of Teodoras Daukantas, Independent Republic of Lithuania Defense Minister ( 1924-1927). Stephen Philbrick of Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia has allowed images of the Eastern European Lyceum images of Teodoras Daukantas to be uploaded to Google Images. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum under USHMM Atchivist Rebecca Erbelding has approved a "Deed of Gift" of the Ceslovas Daukantas  collection to be placed  in the "Rescuing the Evidence" and Permanent Collections" Archives at the U.S.H.M.M.

I could use your advice on how to upload an image of the Defense Minister and submit a Wikipedia page in his honor according to proper submisasion guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zckjsrbn (talk • contribs) 20:42, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

declined due to verification?
Hi,

Could you give me an example of what was referenced that cannot be verified for my submission that caused it to be declined? Granted I am writing about the business I personally started and run, so perhaps I am oblivious to certain things, but if you could give me examples I can fix them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngbunny (talk • contribs) 07:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Alan Riding revisited
Hi, I resubmitted an improved (I hope) Alan Riding article, but it seems to be stuck in resubmission limbo... any idea or advice? Thank you! Markmarkai (talk) 16:00, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Rachael Kelsey Smith
Thank you for taking the time to review my article and point out inconsistencies within the article. I will certainly take the time to look over your tips and guidelines so my next article may be successfully published. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.239.210.130 (talk) 20:05, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Open window7
Hello Snowysusan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Open window7 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Zujua (talk) 06:53, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter
Delivered 01:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

A proposed page that I know is full of lies and there are no references.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/HipHossip.com

I noticed your name at the top of this article so I thought I would contact you.

The woman behind this page is Kemi Olunloyo aka Wikicohen on Wikipedia.

I hope you reject this and throw it in Wikibin or the garbage. This is not her first time. She thinks she is famous.

Take care.

69.165.141.64 (talk) 03:31, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello SnowySusan,

I just resubmitted our article for GreenWaste REcovery and Zanker Road Resource Management. The article is a rewording of our Sustainabilty Report for 2012. I am waiting for a references list from our outreach department, but in the meantime I am hoping that you find our new submission more qualified for approval. There is much more content that shows why we are unique as a waste managment and recycling company, and how our regional company set the standard for waste diversion in California (We built the very first mechanical sortline in the United States. We will operate the largest, most technical and most sophisticated anaerobic digesting facility in the United States.  Currently in the last phase of construction).

I want to put our best foot forward and do everthying we can to achive compliance of the rules that govern this amazing online source of infornmation. Just tell me what to do and I will conform.

Best and Warmest Regards,

Aaron James French — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZankerToughguy (talk • contribs) 17:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Delete a page
Hi! I'm trying to delete my submission "Shortology" but i don't know how. Can you help me? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by H-57 (talk • contribs) 13:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Articles for creation/Soccer For Peace
Hello Snowysusan, Soccer For Peace was declined in October, and I revised in December. I resubmitted for review, but it has not been reviewed yet. Can you please advise? Thank you, gtn107 Gtn107 (talk) 11:46, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Articles for creation/Wargame: AirLand Battle
Hello, just asking if I could resubmit the Wargame: AirLand Battle article? The submission has been declined twice, both because of references, but this time I'm sure that I added in proper referencing. When I try to re-resubmit the article, I cannot find the template above the content, so I decided to go to the history of the article and I readded the template. Is this allowed so I can resubmit the article? - Privatejfx141 (talk) 01:30, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

article about Robbie Steinhouse
Hi Snowysusan

I'm trying to pick up the threads of this piece, which you kindly looked at and tidied up in November. I'm not sure what to do with it now. Should I resubmit it? If so, how? Or does it need further work? I'd be very grateful for your help.

Thanks Fabfred (talk) 11:35, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

edit of entry
Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jo_eliot this edit was submitted on 24.December with citations added, as suggested, but there has been no action! Jo eliot (talk) 22:44, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello,

I am re-visting a posting creation (The Crons Brand) that you had rejected last August with this comment.

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Yet some of the primary references for footnotes were from the NY Times, Pittsburgh Post Gazette, Wall Street Journal, CNBC and USAToday. Not sure why these references do not adquately evidence the subject's notability?

Thank you for the clarification and specific suggestion to improve the posting.

ComeReady (talk) 13:20, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Innosight
Hi Snowy Susan, Hope this finds you well. I am writing regarding the wikipedia:articles for creation page for Innosight. You declined our submission back in August 2012 noting that we didn't have notable sources. Since then, we've added many notable sources such as the WSJ, Businessweek, Forbes, etc. It appears as though I am unable to resubmit the page for review. Can you please provide any insight into why the page is rejected and/or if it has been successfully re-submitted? Thank you in advance and looking forward to your response! Best, Innovatewiki (talk) 20:11, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you (again!)
Hi Susan,

Thank you for putting the article Walkodile" back to it's original version. I also tried to undo one of the edits. I hope I didn't make a mess of it and undo what you did!

I can't believe some people can be so mean spirited about an article that they would tae the time & choose to go into it and vandalise it. Does this happen often? Is there any way I can stop vandalism to the article?

Walkodile was meant to keep children safer - nothing more. We never intended to offend anyone.

p.a. If the article gets vandalised again is there a way for me to delete it. I don't know if I could stand having to check on it all the time for vandalism? It would be a shame but we'd have to consider it.Thanks.

Johnalex001 (talk) 01:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Notable sources
Hello Susan,

I was curious to know what can be considered to be a notable reference, I recently posted an article for approval, I cited my sources correctly, but I'm curious to know whether or the not the sources/articles I cited are viable for a submission. Thank you for your time.

12.21.30.4 (talk) 22:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Jonathan Mosely

Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out! Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Welcoming
Hi Snowysusan, Sorry for digging up old bones (is that even an idiom?), but I noticed you welcomed a user which made only nonconstructive edits which violates WP policies. Please be reminded that welcomes of thanks should only be extended to editors which have made a constructive edit to Wikipedia. I am speaking as a friend who also like to welcome new users and have made similar mistakes, and I hope you can continue with your good work! Kinkreet ~&#9829;moshi moshi&#9829;~ 20:14, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

submission edit help
Hi, my user name is And1re2012, in October you assisted in formatting my article. I am trying to finish it so it can be published. I have given up on trying to load pictures, and now I am having a terrible time trying to remove a blue box around some of the text. If you have time, can you assist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by And1re2012 (talk • contribs) 23:35, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Need help developing/improving an article.
I am working on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Nintendo_Nightmare and need some help revising it. I accidentally submitted it, so do not think it is complete. I can't cite anything other than the game as nothing else exists. I am also unaware how to create the outline boxes. Hopefully, you can take a look and at least finish the article. Who knows, maybe we'll make something that works, and if we do not then it can sit where it is and rot. At least, I will have finished a decent article.

99.140.198.164 (talk) 06:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Note: I forgot to log in tonight, but I should clear any potential sockpuppeting, and tell you that I am TheUnknownNinjaNN2. Yes, I havr read a little too far between the lines with that game, but trust me: I have reigned myself in tremendously. If I did anything with that game: it would be a totally different game! I would have to triple the final version to guide someone throug my "deductions". Just to give an example, I tried making the leaders of the Shroobs brothers (the NN leader and Fawful) I then made the Twibug the Dark Star after losing cotrol and going 'supernova' (what else would you call it). Then, I made the Dark Star a Shroob teraforming device built by Fawful (and lost), because the moon in Majora's Mask ate their planet, and the original Shroob sisters. See how off-target I got! I predict 12 parts (or the equivalent of 6 NNs) just to finish the story!

I will now quit editing this, before I bore you with too many extra details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.140.198.164 (talk) 06:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Edited and want to resubmit
Hi,

You were the last one to review my submission back in October. I removed extraneous information to keep things direct. Could you take a look again? For the life of me I cannot find where to resubmit.

Thanks, Eric — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngbunny (talk • contribs) 03:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Re-review of Middle Eastern Rock Article
I made some edits to my entry based on your comments. I also added a few references to make the entry more relevant:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Byrdsmaniac/sandbox

Please take a look at it and let me know if there is anything else I should add to it to make it more notable and publishable.

Thanks. Byrdsmaniac (talk) 06:07, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject AFC needs your help... again
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Delivered at 13:03, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. --Mdann 52 talk to me! This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Review of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Identifiers.org
Hi,

Thanks very much for looking at my article. I'm afraid I've been very busy, and have only just come back to it, since I had some messages asking people why there was no page on wikipedia ;/ Anyway, I see that you rejected this article stating that it is already covered under Uniform Resource Identifier. I am not entirely convinced by that argument, since by the same token 'Human' should appear under 'Mammal', which should be under 'Animal' and so on. My point is that the page I have tried to create is an example of a URI system, in the same way a Human is an example (sub category) of Mammal. There are already other examples of URI systems which have individual articles in Wikipedia. For instance LSID and Digital Object Identifier.

This article was previously rejected as it did not provide enough context, and issue I had addressed before submitting for the review that you conducted. I would be grateful if you could take another look at it for me.

Thanks very much in advance. Nsjuty (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

AfC AFD
I have nominated an article you accept at AfC for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Cantave, You may possibly want to comment.  DGG ( talk ) 17:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Reply to the Comments found to be public on the Internet and Resubmission of the Contribution
Dear Snowysusan, Greetings! At first, I like to thank you for your immediate response for my submission.But at the same time I am surprised to note that there is a public comment from you in a way of defamation found on the internet. I am Dr. R. Stephen Louie, from India, practising as an Advocate in the Madras High Court, India. My forte is Arbitration Law. To practise as an ADRS professional successfully I am well versed in many related fields such as English Language ( Grammar & Linguistics), Psychology,Business Administration, International Law and other Laws.I am doing / have done many Masters for which I need not be 100 years of age.Till this date at my age 49 I have been studying since I joined school.After completing my B.A.in English from St. Xavier's College, Pallayamkottai, India,run by Jesuit Priests I joined my M.A. in English in Scott Christian College, Nagercoil,in South India. Then I continued my studies in colleges/ Universities on regular basis or by post. This is for the qualification/ recognition of my knowledge. This does not mean that I did every Masters from infamous online Universities. M.Sc in Psychology from Manonmaniam Sundaranar University in Pallayamkottai, India, M.L. from Madras University, India, M.B.A from Manonmaniam Sundarnar University,Guidance and Counselling from Annamalai University,Tamil Nadu, India, M.A in Criminology from Manaonmaniam Sundarnar University and so on. The other details can be found in my enclosed/attached Profile for your kind concern. I was and am not at all intended to promote my profession. Never did I attempt to do that at any time in the past 17/18 years of my Profession. Nor be I inclined to do such a thing.But the way I presented my article would have looked so. Sorry for it. I have fully changed the method of my presentation.I thank you profusely for giving me such an understanding! Then as to the question of my conflict of interests, I am pointing towards peace,for which Alternative Dispute Resolution System demands many aspects, which are by way of using correct language,not being predominant/dominant with any disorder such as delusion or control impulse disorder or by way of knowing/ understanding about Human Resources. A person well versed with all these can be an excellent ADR Professional. This is possible for the persons who really want to spread good news called Peace. The Religion( Christianity) has also to do a lot with this particular part of Law. If permitted by time please read my article : http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/articles/Arbitration-Law-Rooted-Out-from-The-Common-Sense-of-the-Community-3517.asp

Also my faith in Jesus Christ has made me do things in a selfless way.This is no wrong on my part. I am propagating this Peace as propagated by Jesus Christ Himself by way of ARDS Professional and an Advocate. This is a new approach whereby I have introduced a new era in ADRS. I am not sponsored or paid by anyone except for my seminars or for teaching or for my Sessions as an Arbitrator or for my Pleadings/ arguments in the Hon'ble Courts.I am charging a higher fee as I am well qualified,well prepared and at good standing to achieve the target. But, you know, I do not take so many cases in a year as I could not complete them. Mine is quality centred not quantity centred. I work hard for the case to succeed. I am also particular about the ethical points in taking cases or accepting briefs.

Therefore please delete conflict of interests and other defamatory statements.If you need any proof for any of my statements I am at your disposal to send them. I am doing my Examination now also. I am teaching, learning, working where I am not bothered about my being paid for, as I believe the Cosmic Law of God as in the Bible would do its work as it is a Law. I am not believing things as it is and for anybody's sake.It is working in a reasonable way as a fixed Law for me.

You can invite me for any debate for anything you believe to be a lie on my part. I cannot pay and visit but I can spare time using my resources if sponsored. I am living happily with my wife and a child aged 7 without any conflicts whatsoever. Please do the needful. My Profile in detail can be found in http://rslprofile.blogspot.com and other details in my Facebook Page : www. facebook.com/drrslouie

Here is my contribution for your view before my resubmission of it. Please advise me in the matter but please do not make public comments visible to all others sans knowing anything about the person/s in the light of the common understanding of all. Each one is unique.

DETAIL PROFILE OF Dr.R.STEPHEN LOUIE (1)	QUALIFICATION, PROFESSION RELATED MEMBERSHIP & ACTIVITIES A ‘gold medalist’, First class law graduate, coupled with dual law graduation and postgraduate holding masters in Law and in many allied subjects like English Language, Psychology, Business  Administration, Criminology & Victimology   from  well reputed Indian and Foreign Universities, having Doctoral Degrees at his disposal in Law, psychology,  English, Cpeace Administration, besides being certified meritoriously in colleges, barring many Diplomas and certificates  in fields like International Business & Marketing, a few alternative medicinal systems etc. Life-Time Patron of St. Xavier’s College,Pallayamkottai of Jesuit Fathers’ Administration, Scott Christian College, Nagercoil, being these two as his alma mater. Member of many International Arbitration Councils and Organizations, including a Life Individual Member of Indian Council of Arbitration, sponsored by the Ministry of Commerce, Gov. of India, and a well mentioned Associate of greatly reputed and world renown, London, UK based  “The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators”. He is a Member of International Bar Association, UK. An Indian Solicitor Associate of ALAN SIMPSON & CO, a firm regulated u/r Solicitors Regulation Authority,  a written & oral witness for new bills  in Parliament of India. Being an invited Moot-Court Judge in Reputed Law Colleges like Saveetha School of Law(SSL) of Saveetha University. He is a Cpeace International Arbitrator, as certified by International Christian Arbitrators University, a Division of  US Chartered Christian Ministries for CPEACE on the footsteps of UN Charter u/UN General Assembly-Res. No. 35/55/5/XII/1980., Organizational Endorser of the Earth Charter, Registered Rules for ADRS Mechanism by Dr. R. Stephen Louie are supporting Educational Programs of UPEACE University, under the United Nations. Founder- Chairman of High Court Advocates’ Arbitration Council, Chennai.

(2)	PROFESSION AND ITS RELATED RESEARCH & ACTIVITIES A seasoned Advocate by Profession,enrolled at the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, practicing  in Madras High Court, Life Member of SASCV,  Deptt. of Criminology and Criminal Justice, M.S. University, Tirunelveli., had functioned in the level as a Member of International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language-UK., has been attending wide range of conferences/seminars/classes nationally and internationally on language/medicine, psychology/victimology/Arbitration etc and being certified to that effect. Extended special coordination via invitation & sponsorship of delegates to ICADR, u/the aegis of Ministry of Law and Justice, for Conference on ADR-Conciliation & Mediation at  Hotel Hyatt Regency, Chennai, being inaugurated by the Union Minister of Law and Justice, addressed by Judges of Supreme Court and Chief Justice of Madras High Court, and acting chief Justice of Delhi and A.P. High Courts and Governor of Karnataka. Author of many  innovative  books. Editor of YOUR ADVOCATE, a law journal. Trainer on Arbitration Law for advocates of High Courts, a Human Analyst with new approaches for total analysis of a person preparing for dispute settlements. Has functioned as an affiliate In-Charge in India for studies at  an accredited University called St. Regis University, USA., was a General Secretary of well spread International Organization called YMCA., Indian associate of an Int. Language Institute based in France., Worked as Content Reviewer of American Scriptural Translation. He served as a Two year Director of a Lions Club at Chennai. (3)	ACCLAIMED ACTIVITIES Has conducted many classes, seminars, conferences on different subjects, leading to Cpeace. Many VIPs from all walks of life from different professions such as joint Secretaries to Government,  Collectors, Deputy Collectors, judges, Religious Leaders, Teachers, Doctors, Advocates and others have attended his classes and have appraised of him. Has helped to bring in a new era of changes by dint of his knowledge and boldness in Offices like Regional Passport office. Chennai. He has won and been awarded a few awards to his credit, was commented via composed poems. He was specially honoured with Doctor of Medicine(M.A.) for his new findings from the Bible by an open International University, based in Sri Lanka, and FCNT, USA conferred “D.C.”, usually known as one of the higher cadres of its kind in the College of Cardinals under the Pope barring a few other Post Doctoral Honorary Degrees by St. Regis University ,USA. (4)	VISITS, INTERVIEWS & PROGRAMS Has been to the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Belgium, Spain, Singapore , Malaysia, Dubai, and other Countries and many other places of India for his classes/seminars/conferences. Interviewed by many national and International TVs and Magazines. His interviews in Kalai Malar in Jaya TV, Kalaignar News Channel TV’s “Kanam Neethipathi Avarkalae”, Zee Tamil’s “Muthal Kural”, in Raj TV, All India Radio on Cosmic & Arbitration Law are a few in India. Has conducted TV Programs in many TVs on many social evils seeking solutions. He has written articles/contributed with his writings/works / been interviewed in many International ,national, local dailies and magazines such as Indian Express, The Hindu, Ananda Vikadan, Arokia,Thamil Aarasi, Rajam, Builders Line etc. (5)	ELEVATION & TRAINING Many credentials, heart -felt comments/ words from very top people like the Archbishop of Canterbury’s Correspondence Secretary, Mr. Andrew Nunn from LAMBETH PALACE, London  have elevated him a lot. A prominent and a well known political leader in India calls him encyclopaedia of knowledge  for his all rounded knowledge on cosmic law. He has been specially trained as a YMCA Honorary Secretary, in English Language Teaching, Psychology and Mediation, Conciliation, Arbitration by many reputed organizations. (6)	VERSATILE ACTIVITIES He has mixed many fields for his conduct of classes on cosmic law from statuary laws to bio & other psychology, diet, alternative medicine etc., which all have great impact on us for our being law-bound citizens. He was and is a Teacher, Lecturer , an educationist, social worker, propagandist of good tidings of Cpeace. He is certified in all these areas individually and separately by Departments & University/ies, besides being a certified & qualified Guide and Counsellor. He was a Consultant and advisor for The International Council for Health Freedom., was a Correspondent and Senior Principal of a school run by one of the Project YMCAs. Translator of “SOON”, England papers into Tamil with permission and Content Reviewer of Biblical Scriptures when translated from American English into Tamil. (7)	BOOKS Books on English Grammar, Phonetics, Law, Cosmic Law, Diet, Thirukkural, the Bible, many Other Religions, New Educational Aspects and Certification, Arbitration, Conciliation, Mediation. These are the output of his analysis, research and hard core thinking. They are very different in nature, their approach is unique and new and first of its kind. Full Description is separately given. (8)	KNOWLEDGE IMPARTATION His seminars would rain knowledge from various aspects of our being under the Control of Law and the use of ADRS Mechanism - Mediation, Conciliation and Arbitration while the Law is being disturbed .His drafts on premarital ,post divorce, conjugal  agreements, and other contract executions are uniquely taught.He is  registered in many private and Government sites as a Resource Person  for Knowledge Impartation such as for RTI, Arbitration Law, Constitutional Law. Prone to giving totally free consultation for the poor in any area on the major Laws leaping forward for justice. (9)	EXPOSURE TO ADR MECHANISM He conducts hundreds of mediations, arbitrations, conflict strategies, dispute management settlements and neutral fact finding engagements each year. He has been handling bank’s financial cases, land disputes, family conciliation, Cheque Bounce cases, rental disputes, owner& tenant disputes, fiduciary relationship breach cases  etc. Mediator/ Conciliator before being an Arbitrator is his approach in handling cases if there is no specific Arbitration Clause/s found in the Agreement. Specific Rules are being observed as per the 1996 Act for conducting cases. Had functioned as Arbitrator for the very poor  and the very rich in Tamil Nadu and elsewhere. Has been conducting Mediation ,Conciliation and Arbitration, helping the people settle their disputes extra judicially, discouraging litigation. (10)	ACCESSIBILITY a)	Blog http://profiles.blogspot.com  [Profile in Voice(English & Tamil) & in Script]

b)	 Facebook-Page www.facebook.com/drrslouie

c)	Youtube       www.youtube.com/channel/UCxjDH66Q0h-Xhjr3SqaH5pA                 http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkWzoFuKzDx1ijZZMc6q2SA

d)      Emails

drrslouie@gmail.com theadvocate@live.com Youradvocatelawacademy@gmail.com merchandizeofwisdom@hotmail.com

e)     Snail Mail

Dr. R. Stephen Louie P.Box No. 2201, Chennai-600002, India Registered Mails, Couriers & Prior Appointments: DR. R. STEPHEN LOUIE F-9, I PHASE, I FLOOR, SPENCER PLAZA, CHENNAI-02, India Offices Dr. R. Stephen Louie, Advocate No.7, Vannier Street, Chennai-01 Residential Office : On appointment only

f)     Venue of Classes

ICSA Program Center 107, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai-08 g)      Mobile/ Phone :

9677005212 / 9444587777

Thanking you profusely I look forward to hearing from you in this regard via : drrslouie@gmail.com / youradvocatelawacademy@gmail.com

Yours Faithfully, Adv. Dr. R. Stephen Louie Drrslouie (talk) 07:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Excuse me for jumping in here, but I notice your draft article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/R. Stephen Loui was deleted in December 2013, therefore any comments left by Snowysusan would no longer exist either. Snowysusan has not been active on Wikipedia since 2012.
 * Draft articles submitted to the Articles for Creation process need to meet a number of basic criteria to be accepted, notability, neutral point of view and verifiability for example. Comments are usually left by reviewers to give pertinent help and advice.
 * The main problem may arise here because you appear to be writing an article about yourself. This is strongly discouraged, partly because (as you have discovered) you will find it difficult to be objective about yourself and may take personal offence at other editors' opinions/edits.
 * Before you submit another article about yourself, you may want to look at Wikipedia's 'golden rule' and WP:GNG to check whether you are sufficiently widely known and important for a Wikipedia profile. Kind regards. Sionk (talk) 17:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi.

What makes you think I tried to create a page about National Legal Scholars Law Firm? I didn't. I never heard of National Legal Scholars Law Firm. Your message did not please me.

GattoDanny (talk) 23:20, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello Snowysusan, Wikipedia has identified me as a major contributor to the Teodoras Daukantas article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teodoras_Daukantas and agrees that I have a close connection with its subject.I am prepared to justify the claim.

justification: Wikipedia indicates that the Teodoras Daukantas page may require cleanup in order to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly a neutral point of view,and on general guidelines for submission of notable individuals ,(September 2014),

I took the advice of a previous talk page critique and joined the Wiki Lithuania Project talk page as a participant.

My initial query to the talk page allowed me,the event handler,to add my name as participant to the Wiki Lithuania Project as the aforementioned major contributor posted September 13, 2014 at 16:52.I thank the talk page source for being  forthright and timely in the critique. I assured the Wikipedia source that I am on task with the clean up up of the Teodoras Daukantas page including a valid Teodoras Daukantas Image (jpg) even if it is of a Lithuanian origin.

n.b.

I need help to validate a proper image spurce for Teodoras Daukantas to justify Wikipedia criteria for uploading an image to the Wiki Media creative commons page sans fear of copyright infringement.

In that regard I have attached a hyperlink link, http://gvdaukantas.wordpress.com/ embedded within a WordPress web site thereby substantiating a claim that,Cabinet Defense Minister,Teodoras Daukantas meets the criteria for inclusion to Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia under the General Guidelines for notable individuals, Teodoras Daukantas article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teodoras_Daukantas .--Zckjsrbn 22:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC). The two identified (microsoft.word)file.docs indicate ,(0ne European League of Nations Treaty, #3542 ) and ( One minister.doc).

Thank you !

The courtesy of a reply is most appreciated.

Added by Zckjsrbn (talk • contribs) 21:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Zckjsrbn 22:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Zckjsrbn 18:42, 20 September 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zckjsrbn (talk • contribs)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)