User talk:Sntntnvzbrstčmrlj

December 2022
Hi Sntntnvzbrstčmrlj! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at S wave that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 22:14, 14 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Dawnseeker2000! Thank you for educating me, I didn't know. I just deleted one citation and thought that is a minor correction, because it's just a number and a reference. I definitely didn't think it's changing the meaning of an article. I kind of viewed it as vandalism, because the reference was obviously non-helpful and irrelevant to the subject (specifically Helmholtz equation is a well-known equation that is relevant in all kinds of physics topics, not some fringe equation that they "invented" in that random article). After deleting the reference, only the reference to the wikipedia entry "helmholtz equation" is left, and that is actually relevant and helpful.
 * Thank you again. Best. Sntntnvzbrstčmrlj (talk) 11:02, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, just a P.S. Another interpretation of the reference could be to support the claim about the steady state SH waves, but that is also a big stretch. In the referenced article the claim "steady state SH waves are a solution of the Helmholtz equation" just has another citation. It would be more appropriate to cite a general introductory textbook. Actually I am going to do that now.
 * Don't want to spam to much. Cheers. Sntntnvzbrstčmrlj (talk) 11:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)