User talk:Snuggleblanket

Snuggleblanket, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Thank you, but j'm more into editing! Snuggleblanket (talk) 15:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Little Quack!, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so I have moved it to Draft:Little Quack! so that you can continue working on it. If you have any questions, please leave a note on this page. Please consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. - MrX 17:06, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Riley Martin (Actor


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Riley Martin (Actor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:22, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phillipa Alexander


The article Phillipa Alexander has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Badanamu: Learn and Play


The article Badanamu: Learn and Play has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Badanamu does not appear to be a television program, but rather a company that produces educational materials (games, videos, etc., see their website). The company does not appear to be notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Infobox Show


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Infobox Show, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Badanamu: Learn and Play
The subject did not look very notableand awas "PRODded" for that reason. Unless you wis to contest the nomination, it's best to leave the template where it is. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 13:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hannah Swain


A tag has been placed on Hannah Swain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WriterListener 12:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

But, She's REAL! Snuggleblanket (talk) 23:48, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Badanamu: Learn and Play for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Badanamu: Learn and Play is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badanamu: Learn and Play until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:09, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 13 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Whisker Haven Tales with the Palace Pets page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=749277393 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F749277393%7CWhisker Haven Tales with the Palace Pets%5D%5D Ask for help])

December 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Toopy and Binoo are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm JosVan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to JimJam have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Josvan  Talk  02:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Hoax proliferation
Please stop trying to proliferate hoaxes as it appears you've done here and here. Surely if these things were being rebooted, you'd have brought sufficient references to support the claims. If you submit any more unsourced content like this again, I will indefinitely interrupt your account. Other issues:

Please keep these close in mind going forward, as deviations will very likely result in the interruption of your editing privileges. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You need to be able to edit in proper English using proper typography. This edit, where you randomly capitalise words and use the strange description "ballerina-like" is not helpful. If English is not your primary language, you should probably wait until your skills get a bit stronger before editing prose. Otherwise, you are expected to be able to write in competent English.
 * Talk pages are not for pointless chatter like this. Talk pages are to be used to discuss specific improvements to the article.
 * Reruns are not noteworthy.
 * This isn't proper English, and it's unsourced.
 * Adding chatter to articles isn't helpful.

Disambiguation link notification for April 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Puppy Dog Pals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maltese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Proper typography
Hi there, re: this edit, please don't use nonstandard capitalization when submitting prose at Wikipedia. A normal sentence is written like this. Not Like This. If you're not too sharp in English, we typically only capitalize proper nouns like character names, locations, and specifically named things. So "building" is not capitalized, but the "Empire State Building" is, because it is a building with a proper name. Your edits require other editors to go through and fix the problems, which ultimately is not helpful. Also, please note that per WP:TVPLOT you have somewhere in the 150-200 word range to write a comprehensive summary that establishes the episode's premise, includes a few details, and then presents the conclusion. You're not limited to a mere sentence here. I'm hoping that this revelation might help you to expand your vision for future edits. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:51, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Little Quack!


Hello, Snuggleblanket. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Little Quack!".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 02:07, 5 March 2018 (UTC)