User talk:Soapwort/Archive 1

Kurdish–Turkish conflict (1978–present)
 PLEASE STOP  changing or removing reliably sourced, content as you have done on  the Kurdish–Turkish conflict (1978–present) article. If you continue to disruptively edit, you may be permanently blocked from Wikipedia - Cengizsogutlu (talk) 12:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Cengizsogutlu, as I said in the edit log multiple times, the Kurdish Institute article is a republication of an article at Al-Monitor, which I replaced it with. The KI website states at the top of the page: "This article was published on Al-Monitor on February 4, 2016". As for the Daily Sabah and TRT World articles, both have been discussed with respect to the article previously and were agreed to not be reliable on the subject. TRT World is also listed as unreliable on subjects where the government has a conflict of interest (see WP:RSPSRC), such as the Kurdish conflict. Furthermore, neither article mentioned "other Kurdish tribes" (other than the Village Guards, which are listed) being belligerents in the conflict anyway, only that they were opposed to the PKK. Please read the edit summaries before reverting edits and especially before threatening reports. Soapwort (talk) 12:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I added new source why did you ignore it? Shadow4dark (talk) 13:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, I responded on the article talk page. Soapwort (talk) 14:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Help in improving the Pınarcık massacre page
Hello Soapwort I hope you are well. I would like to to ask you if you can help in improving the Pınarcık massacre page. I made a revision which I thought was neutral and exclusively reporting the facts rather than pushing a certain POV, later it was reverted by a user called GGT. I want to avoid an edit war, and at the same time I feel there is something wrong going on here that needs to be corrected. For example look at the difference in narrative compared to the Başbağlar massacre. Ayhan Çarkın's statements are viewed very differently in the articles (purely because of the editor). The user GGT has made sure to specifically put the blame on the PKK to the top based on a single source that claims the PKK to have done it, while ignoring or smearing the statement from the ex-police special forces officer. Claims that sources do not mention the confession is actually proof that they don't consider it (really)... So when examining the sources mentioned, they don't even go into Pınarcık massacre to make it relevant to actually be talking about his statement so he's twisting the narrative here. He is very hostile and dodging points, so I would like this to article to be improved by more parties. If you care to assist. TataofTata (talk) 16:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi, I looked into what was being discussed on the article talk page and have responded there. Soapwort (talk) 12:21, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

pkk casualities
why do you delete my edit on the turkish claim on pkk casualities look for yourself https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/war-on-terror/316-terrorists-eliminated-so-far-in-2022-turkish-defense-ministry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C3:4F2D:7C10:6105:436D:7F38:9640 (talk) 18:57, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aytaç Doğan


A tag has been placed on Aytaç Doğan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:51, 6 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, I've restored the contents of the deleted article Aytaç Doğan as you requested to your userspace at User:Soapwort/Aytaç Doğan, where you can work on it further. Best wishes -- Cactus.man  &#9997;  11:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Soapwort (talk) 11:41, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)