User talk:SobakaKachalova

Welcome
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  10:23, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

January 2010
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.)  --bender235 (talk) 14:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The article Vladimir Miklyukov is not about myself. My name is Alexandra and I am Vladimir's daughter and his publishing representative. I am a tech support for his websites where we keep texts of the lectures and repository of all published works. The article does satisfy criteria of Notability, No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability. Pure mathematical research is not as popular as punk rock music, nobody would bother to waist their time writing on topics they are not intersted in, that is why Russian, Ukrainian, and English wikipedias miss a great deal of core information in mathematics. There is nothing illogical or wrong in writing about notable friends and relatives, it just has to be within the above rules (no emotional expressions + all the verifiable sources).
 * Let's take a test: would my article pass the censorship if I did not shout out my real name on the members page? yes, it would. It would still break the rule of WP:COI, just nobody would find out. I don't believe in hiding a real name, because confidentiality rule of wikipedia compromises the seriousness of the whole encyclopedic project we are working on: wearing the mask makes cheating invisible. Confidentiality is only good for art things, wikipedia is not an art project. Threfore, I include my name here.


 * About the rules (WP:COI), just today I've found a lovely argument in Oran Canfield's memoir book "Long Past Stopping". In response to some school's discriminatory policy, his mother said: "There would not be any civil rights if we had just mindlessly obeyed the law" (p.112-113). And every law has exceptions, by the way.--sobaka_kachalova 03:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I did not mean to say that you should not write about your relatives. It was just a hint that this is delicate thing, and that you should be aware of those Wikipedia rules such as WP:COI, WP:NPOV, for example. --bender235 (talk) 03:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Third opinion: I just saw that there's a pending 3O for this page. What exactly is the third opinion for? SobakaKachalova is clearly a conflict of interest, and this article definitely looks like it was edited by someone who's a COI. So what's the issue? —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The third party has been asked to verify that
 * the stub tag is not relevant anymore since the article was rewritten in January and a stub tag was assigned in October or November.
 * all the sources are verifiable and are not the product of original research
 * the subject is notable
 * --15:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * My point: The article does satisfy criteria of Notability, No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability, even though it was written by a close relative and technically violates the rules of WP:COI. The stub and other "offensive" tags should be updated or removed.--sobaka_kachalova 15:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * It's true that the article does satisfy WP:N, but there are a great deal of issues. For example, some of your sources aren't actual sources. You write "In 1968, after graduatiation from Donetsk State University", and the source given is "Now Donetsk National University (Donetsk, Ukraine)." That's not a source, that's a footnote. You need an actual secondary reliable source to verify that. In another place you use write that "Georgy Dmitrievich Suvorov" was his doctoral adviser, and the source you give is an article on the Russian Wiki. Wiki articles aren't reliable sources, so they can't be used like this. I see both of these are done in several places in the article. Until these issues are taken care of, the tags should stay. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

FYI conflict of interest guideline
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia in Vladimir Miklyukov or other articles, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * see also: Wikipedia is not a soapbox and What may I not have on my user page?
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Athaenara ✉  16:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

links fixed
I did fix the references to the best of my knowledge. Can I ask someone please to review and update the tags on Talk:Vladimir_Miklyukov. Thanx a lot.--sobaka_kachalova 00:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC) --sobaka_kachalova 17:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You should get someone else to check it for neutrality, sorry I cannot do it as I am hanging out on IRC and doing something else. Thanks! Samwb123T (R)-C-E 19:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)


 * That appears to be a very good article, very well sourced, congratulations. However, I do not think those templates should be removed from the article talk page. Currently, there are three.  1.) The article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons... 2.) The article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography... 3.) An individual covered by or significantly related to this article has made non-trivial contributions to the article.  Let us look at each of those three templates.  1.) Yes, the article must adhere to the policy, this cannot be changed.  2.) The article is a biography and is thus within that scope.  3.) You basically wrote the article yourself.  You appear to have done a tremendous job and are to be congratulated for that, however, you did write it yourself and a person should possibly bear that in mind in case you were biased in some way.  You appear to have been very factual, which is great, but we do not want the authorship to surprise someone later on.  So, I think all the three templates should stay.  But, they don't detract anything from the page itself -- good work, again.  If there's anything else I can do, please contact me on my talk page. :) Banaticus (talk) 09:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks a lot to everyone for taking care of Vladimir_Miklyukov. The article looks very much better now. And Happy Valentine's Day, which is this Sunday (the 14th)((-: --sobaka_kachalova 17:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 17:32, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Need help to delete an image
helpme Question: I need some help to delete an image VolgogradPedagogicalUniversity.png (there were 3 versions). First error was with thumbnail, second two I think I left the wrong extension converting *.jpg to *.png and therefore could not get rid of the black background. I have replaced that image with VolgogradPedagogicalUniversity.jpg, so the *.png can be deleted all 3 versions.

Thanks a lot.--sobaka_kachalova 19:05, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You can tag the image with and an admin will delete it. C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 19:40, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I also uploaded a much smaller version of the .jpg image to confirm with low resolution standards per 3B at WP:NFCC C T J F 8 3 GoUSA 20:26, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It looks much better. Thanx(-:--sobaka_kachalova 20:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, I also tagged the the png for deletion. C <font color="#ff6600">T <font color="#ffff00">J <font color="#009900">F <font color="#0000ff">8 <font color="#6600cc">3 GoUSA 21:21, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrick McKeown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cork (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrick McKeown


A tag has been placed on Patrick McKeown, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ww2censor (talk) 22:40, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your request for undeletion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Patrick McKeown. JohnCD (talk) 15:16, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:04, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrick McKeown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:30, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:VolSU.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:VolSU.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 18:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:ComeniusMedal1953.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ComeniusMedal1953.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)