User talk:Sobanhazarwi

August 2013
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

How many blocks do you need to understand that you can not remove maintenance templates without solving the issues? Your alter ego has been removing those templates four times after your block and you once. Go one like this an a longer block than the last one will arrive soon. The Banner talk 21:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  kashmiri TALK  22:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing again, this time for a week, for further disruptive editing, both using this account and anonymously. Considering the number of times that you have removed maintenance templates from the article Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi, despite numerous warnings, the fact that you have removed an Articles for Deletion notice from the same article, and other disruptive editing, both in that article and elsewhere, you may expect to see a substantially longer block if you continue in the same way when this block expires. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:16, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pasban Khatme Nabuwwat


A tag has been placed on Pasban Khatme Nabuwwat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 10:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Pasban Khatme Nabuwwat for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pasban Khatme Nabuwwat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pasban Khatme Nabuwwat & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 12:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Majlis Tahaffuz Khatme Nabuwwat


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Majlis Tahaffuz Khatme Nabuwwat. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Tehreek-e-Khatme Nabuwwat. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Tehreek-e-Khatme Nabuwwat – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. S M S Talk 09:39, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Majlis Tahaffuz Khatme Nabuwwat


The article Majlis Tahaffuz Khatme Nabuwwat has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Single-sourced POV fork of Tehreek-e-Khatme Nabuwwat, with largely similar text. Conversion to redirect was reverted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  08:56, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Majlis Tahaffuz Khatme Nabuwwat for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Majlis Tahaffuz Khatme Nabuwwat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Majlis Tahaffuz Khatme Nabuwwat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  11:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Manaqib-al-Jalila for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manaqib-al-Jalila is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Manaqib-al-Jalila until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  13:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pasban-e-Khatam-un-Nabuwat


A tag has been placed on Pasban-e-Khatam-un-Nabuwat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. S M S Talk 22:16, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohammad Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chamba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2015
Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Barelvi, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 22:56, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Mohammad Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi. Dl2000 (talk) 01:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely
Even though it's been two years since your last block, you show no change in your pattern of removing maintenance templates from articles and refusing to discuss the situation. As a result, to (1) prevent further disruption of the project from removal of templates and (2) require you to discuss the removal, I am revoking your rights to edit articles. You must enter into discussion here, including why you're removing the templates, to be allowed to edit. You will also need to demonstrate your willingness to comply with guidelines, including leaving the required templates in place, to be allowed to edit again.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. —C.Fred (talk) 12:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)